Table 5.
Determination of 5 constituents using different instruments (mg/g, n = 3).
| Regions | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPLC | HPLC | UPLC | HPLC | UPLC | HPLC | UPLC | HPLC | UPLC | HPLC | |
| Beihai | 1.918 | 1.940 | 0.356 | 0.346 | 1.073 | 0.955 | 0.144 | 0.146 | 0.225 | 0.229 |
| Qinzhou | 2.679 | 2.796 | 0.341 | 0.363 | 2.438 | 2.425 | 0.157 | 0.161 | 0.561 | 0.639 |
| Wuzhou | 1.828 | 1.824 | 0.237 | 0.225 | 1.842 | 1.835 | 0.148 | 0.150 | 0.460 | 0.469 |
| Yulin | 1.631 | 1.698 | 0.261 | 0.264 | 1.799 | 1.799 | 0.140 | 0.148 | 0.425 | 0.421 |
| Nanning | 2.587 | 2.617 | 0.289 | 0.276 | 1.601 | 1.613 | 0.172 | 0.167 | 0.471 | 0.469 |
| Chongzuo | 1.850 | 1.827 | 0.266 | 0.243 | 0.426 | 0.443 | 0.109 | 0.115 | 0.213 | 0.210 |
| Liuzhou | 1.259 | 1.234 | 0.303 | 0.309 | 3.521 | 3.372 | 0.145 | 0.143 | 0.892 | 0.931 |
| Guigang | 1.880 | 1.882 | 0.220 | 0.216 | 2.589 | 2.410 | 0.189 | 0.194 | 0.751 | 0.798 |
| Hezhou | 2.915 | 3.002 | 0.260 | 0.262 | 1.936 | 1.918 | 0.192 | 0.184 | 0.522 | 0.571 |
| Fangchenggang | 1.462 | 1.490 | 0.286 | 0.280 | 0.699 | 0.685 | 0.129 | 0.128 | 0.358 | 0.392 |
| Pearson's coefficient (r) | 0.998∗∗ | 0.970∗∗ | 0.998∗∗ | 0.982∗∗ | 0.995∗∗ | |||||
∗∗At level 0.01 (two-tailed), the correlation was significant.