Table 5.
Comparisons of selected studies in the detection of masses in the DBT images.
| Method | Classifier | DBT dataset size | Sen | Acc | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim et al. [31] | LDA | 36 | 0.90 | — | — |
| Shamsolmoali et al. [28] | SVM | 160 | — | — | 0.847 |
| Sajjad et al. [29] | DCNN | 344 | 0.89 | 0.864 | — |
| Glorot and Bengio et al. [30] | DCNN | 324 | 0.80 | — | 0.80 |
| Palma et al. [17] | SVM | 101 | 0.90 | — | — |
| Chan et al. [16] | Neural network | 752 | 0.80 | — | — |
| Reiser et al. [14] | LDA | 100 | 0.80 | — | — |
| Proposed | U-net | 87 | 0.869 | 0.871 | 0.859 |