Table 4.
Ranking of CSO algorithm compared to the modern metaheuristic algorithms.
| Test functions | Ranking of CSO | Ranking of DA | Ranking of BOA | Ranking of FDO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| F2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| F3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| F4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| F5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| F6 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| F7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| F8 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| F9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| F10 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| F11 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| F12 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| F13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| F14 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| F15 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| F16 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| F17 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| F18 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| F19 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| F20 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| F21 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| F22 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| F23 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Cec01 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Cec02 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Cec03 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Cec04 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Cec05 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Cec06 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Cec07 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Cec08 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Cec09 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Cec10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 70 | 97 | 91 | 72 |
| Overall ranking | 2.121212 | 2.939394 | 2.757576 | 2.181818 |
| F1–F7 subtotal | 15 | 27 | 11 | 17 |
| F1–F7 ranking | 2.142857 | 3.857143 | 1.571429 | 2.428571 |
| F8–F23 subtotal | 32 | 43 | 45 | 40 |
| F8–F23 ranking | 2 | 2.6875 | 2.8125 | 2.5 |
| CEC01–CEC10 subtotal | 23 | 27 | 35 | 15 |
| CEC01–CEC10 ranking | 2.3 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 1.5 |