Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;102(5):971–981. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0578

Table 3.

Effectiveness ranking summary data—mean rank by participant group*

Prevention method depicted on card Women currently pregnant Men with a pregnant partner Women likely to become pregnant Overall mean rank
Removing any container-like objects from public spaces 3.42 4.75 10.25 6.14
Eliminating/emptying containers in the yard 4.25 9.13 8.56 7.31
Sweeping outdoors 5.04 4.00 9.13 6.06
Eliminating exposed tires 7.67 7.13 8.31 7.70
The steps of water container (pila) cleaning 7.75 3.75 6.00 5.23
Chlorinate the water in the drum (and cover) 8.25 9.75 14.00 10.67
Bed net use during pregnancy 8.88 12.13 7.38 9.46
Covering water drums 9.13 6.50 11.88 9.17
Emptying buckets 9.13 9.13 7.44 8.56
Screens for windows and doors 9.88 11.63 6.63 9.38
Temephos (larvicide) application to stored water 10.00 7.50 13.56 10.35
Skin repellent use during pregnancy 10.63 13.63 10.25 11.50
Condom use during pregnancy 11.25 15.13 6.81 11.06
Technician spraying insecticide indoors 11.38 8.63 8.69 9.56
Condom use outside of pregnancy 12.63 14.00 8.50 11.71
Family planning methods 13.75 16.50 13.13 14.46
Abstinence from sexual relations 15.50 16.13 11.06 14.23
Outdoor fogging 16.00 7.50 12.75 12.08
Wearing long sleeves 16.00 13.13 12.75 13.96

* Average of four focus groups, two per study site. Rank range 1–19. The order in which prevention methods are listed follows the rank order by women currently pregnant for which Zika-related risk would be most immediate.