Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 May 7;81(4):647–679. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.007

Table 2.

Performance of variables in predicting clinical outcomes.

Outcomes Predictors AU ROC 95% CI P Cut-off Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV NPV LR+ LR-
Need for IRVS CRB 0.77 ± 0.05 0.69-0.85 <0.001 1 72 79.1 48.6 91.1 3.45 0.35
CRB 2 28 96.7 70 83 8.49 0.74
CRB-65 0.81 ± 0.05 0.73-0.88 <0.001 1 88 45.1 30.6 93.2 1.6 0.27
CRB-65 2 64 93.4 72.7 90.4 9.71 0.39
CRB-65 3 24 97.8 75 82.4 10.92 0.78
CURB-65 0.85 ± 0.05 0.77-0.91 <0.001 1 88 42.9 29.7 92.9 1.54 0.28
CURB-65 2 80 87.9 64.5 94.1 6.62 0.23
CURB-65 3 52 96.7 81.2 88 15.77 0.5
CURB-65 4 12 98.9 75 80.4 10.92 0.89
qSOFA 0.70 ± 0.06 0.60-0.78 <0.001 1 80 47.3 29.4 89.6 1.52 0.42
qSOFA 2 24 98.9 85.7 82.6 21.84 0.77

Abbreviations: AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; LR, likelihood ratio; PPV, positive predictive values; NPV, negative predictive value; CRB, confusion, respiratory rate, and blood pressure; CRB-65, confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age ≥65 years; CURB-65, confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age ≥65 years; qSOFA, quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; IRVS, intensive respiratory or vasopressor support. Bold: the optimal cut-off values according to Youden index.

AUC comparisons

CRB-65 vs. qSOFA, P=0.02; CRB-65 vs. CRB, P=0.22; CRB-65 vs. CURB-65, P=0.08; CRB vs. qSOFA, P=0.09.