Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 12;3(3):111–119. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy070

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the 7 studies analyzed

Prospective trials Clinical practice diary studies
(Fleming et al., 2012) (Melicharkova et al., 2013) (Hookey & Vanner, 2009) (Fowler et al., 2009) (Flemming et al., 2015) (Arya et al., 2014) (Vanner & Hookey, 2011)
Patient characteristics N = 236 (%) N = 108a (%) N = 213 (%) N = 49 (%) N = 109a (%) N = 557 (%) N = 100
Age, y, mean (SD) 56.3 (11.1) 57.0 (12.4) 54.6 (9.8) 75 (3.5) 62.7 (13.8) 59.2 (11.2) 60.2 (11.9)
Age ≥ 70 y 20 (8.5) 12 (11.1) 14 (6.6) 49 (100.0) 41 (37.6) 102 (18.3) 22
Female Sex 127 (53.8) 60 (55.6) 106 (49.8) 24 (49.0) 60 (55.0) 291 (52.2) 58
Avg bowel movement (SD) 1.5 (1.0) 1.6 (1.3) 1.1 (0.5) 1.5 (0.8) 1.8 (1.5) 1.7 (1.8) 1.7 (1.1)
Comorbiditiesb 16 (6.8) Not collected 5 (2.3) 9 (18.4) Not collected 243 (43.6) 16
Bowel preparation
 PEG, traditional 0 0 0 0 49 (45.0) 14 (2.5) 0
 PEG, split-dose 0 0 0 0 60 (55.0) 158 (28.4) 0
 P/MC, traditional 117 (49.6) 68 (63.0) 104 (48.8) 25 (51.0) 0 218 (39.1) 34
 P/MC, split-dose 119 (50.4) 40 (37.0) 0 23 (46.9) 0 150 (26.9) 66
 Other 0 0 109 (51.2) 0 0 9 (1.6) 0
Indication for colonoscopy
 Screeningc 132 (55.9) 80 (74.1) 138 (64.8) 9 (18.4) 15 (13.8) 238 (42.7) 30
 FOBT+ 16 (6.8) 28 (25.9) 7 (3.3) 7 (14.3) 5 (4.6) 47 (8.4) 13
 IBS, Crohns, colitis 5 (2.1) 0 9 (4.2) 0 10 (9.2) 40 (7.2) 54
 Bowel habit change, NYD 14 (5.9) 0 9 (4.2) 2 (4.0) 10 (9.2) 23 (4.1) 9
 Anemia 1 (0.4) 0 2 (0.9) 1 (2.0) 26 (23.9) 22 (3.9) 6
 Diarrhea 8 (3.4) 0 7 (3.3) 1 (2.0) 13 (11.9) 1 (0.2) 6
 BRBPR 16 (6.8) 0 11 (5.2) 3 (6.1) 12 (11.0) 11 (2.0) 6
 Known polyp 41 (17.4) 0 29 (13.6) 25 (51.0) 17 (15.6) 55 (9.9) 22
 Nausea/vomiting 1 (0.4) 0 0 0 1 (0.9) 0 0
 Abdominal pain 0 0 1 (0.5) 1 (2.0) 0 3 (0.5) 2
 Unknown 2 (0.8) 0 0 0 0 117 (21) 0

All values are number (percentage) of patient characteristic in each study, unless otherwise specified.

Abbreviations: FOBT, fecal occult blood test; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; NYD, not yet diagnosed; BRBPR, bright red bleeding per rectum

aOnly included patients randomized to non-breakfast study arm.

bPico Timing Study, Original Pico Study and Pico in Elderly study only looked at diabetes mellitus, where the Diary study looked at DM, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and kidney disease.

cScreening includes colonoscopy indicated through positive family history.