Table 3.
Effect of bismuth subsalicylate and dietary sulfur level on DM, OM and fiber digestion in continuous culture
| Treatment1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low sulfur | High sulfur | P-value | ||||||
| Item, g/100 g | CON | BSS | CON | BSS | SEM2 | BSS | Sulfur | B × S |
| DM, apparent | 47.1 | 39.2 | 50.3 | 39.3 | 1.4 | < 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.38 |
| DM, true3 | 64.1 | 46.9 | 67.9 | 47.6 | 2.5 | < 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.33 |
| OM, apparent | 37.5 | 26.9 | 41.4 | 28.2 | 1.8 | < 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.46 |
| OM, true3 | 52.8 | 34.1 | 57.2 | 35.9 | 2.7 | < 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.33 |
| NDF | 19.3 | 27.5 | 24.4 | 30.0 | 4.5 | 0.15 | 0.41 | 0.77 |
| ADF | 32.1 | 35.0 | 36.7 | 38.2 | 2.9 | 0.47 | 0.21 | 0.81 |
1Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial design, with dietary sulfur at 0.12 (low sulfur) or 0.42 (high sulfur) % of diet DM, and bismuth subsalicylate at 0 (CON) and 0.5 (BSS) % of diet DM. High sulfur level was achieved by addition of sodium sulfate to the basal diet.
2Standard error of the mean, n = 4 observations per treatment.
3Corrected for microbial contribution.