Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 1;1(4):448–457. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0049

Table 5.

Chemical analysis of diets (as-fed basis), Exp. 21

Formulated standardized ileal digestible Val:Lys ratio, %2
Item 50 57 63 68 73 78 85
Item, %3
    DM 89.84 90.16 90.37 90.24 90.35 90.06 90.24
    CP 17.0 18.7 17.6 18.0 18.0 19.3 17.6
    Crude fiber 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.2 2.0 1.8
    Ether extract 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.2
    Ash 5.25 5.58 5.26 5.08 5.17 5.14 5.14
AA analysis, %4
    Lys 1.32 1.33 1.37 1.35 1.35 1.33 1.34
    Ile 0.76 0.78 0.77 0.77 0.78 0.87 0.80
    Leu 1.56 1.54 1.54 1.51 1.55 1.61 1.59
    Met 0.46 0.50 0.50 0.48 0.49 0.46 0.48
    Met + Cys 0.73 0.77 0.77 0.74 0.78 0.75 0.77
    Thr 0.92 0.89 0.92 0.89 0.90 0.94 0.96
    Trp 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
    Val 0.78 0.84 0.88 0.92 0.99 1.04 1.10
    His 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.42 0.44 0.43
    Phe 0.83 0.92 0.82 0.80 0.83 0.86 0.84

1Treatment diet samples were collected at the feed mill after manufacturing.

2SID = Standardized ileal digestible; Low (50% SID Val:Lys) and high (85% SID Val:Lys) diets were blended at the feed mill to create the intermediate treatments.

3Composite samples were submitted to Ward Laboratories (Kearney, NE) for analysis.

4Composite samples were submitted to Ajinomoto Heartland Inc. (Chicago, IL) for AA analysis.