. 2020 Apr 30;11:373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00373

Table 4.

Comparison of TERS total score and subscales between risk groups.

	TERS risk groups [Hoodin and Kalbfleisch (10)]			Statistics
	Low risk N = 179	Moderate risk N = 170	High risk N = 41	Kruskal-Wallis-Test
TERS total score, Mean (SD) [range 26.5–79.5]	27.5 (1.1)^a	32.5 (2.0)^b	43.0 (5.0)^c	X² = 325.05 (df = 2) p < .001
Factor “emotional sensitivity,” Mean (SD) [range 9–27]	9.2 (0.7)^a	12.6 (1.9)^b	15.4 (2.8)^c	X² = 253.62 (df = 2) p < .001
Factor “defiance,” Mean (SD) [range 17.5–52.5]	18.3 (1.2)^a	20.0 (2.2)^b	27.5 (4.1)^c	X² = 154.46 (df = 2) p < .001

Different superscripts (a-c) indicate significant differences in post-hoc test (Dunn-Bonferroni-test).