Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 29;61(1):2. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.1.2

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Random-effects meta-analysis comparing the effective radius growth rates (mm/year) of GA lesions with different lesion locations. (A) In GA location classification 1, the effective radius growth rate in the center point spared group is 0.048 mm/year faster than in the center point involved group (P < 0.001). (B) Similarly, in GA location classification 2, the effective radius growth rate in the foveal zone spared group is 0.082 mm/year faster than in the foveal zone involved group (P < 0.001). The diamond represents the overall effect estimate (width of the diamond represents the 95% CIs). For each individual study, different data marker sizes indicate weight, and the lines represent the 95% CIs. SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.