Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 16;42:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.11.003

Table 5.

Two multivariate analyses

Variable Categories A: Controlling for demographics and stigma only
B: Controlling for demographics, social cohesion and stigma
Multivariate analysis (n = 1260)
Multivariate analysis (n = 1260)
RDS-Weighted
Unweighted
RDS-Weighted
Unweighted
aOR (outcome = HIV +) 95% CI aOR (outcome = HIV +) 95% CI aOR (outcome = HIV +) 95% CI aOR (outcome = HIV +) 95% CI
Stigma
 Perceived stigma Zero 1 1 1 1
One or more 1.0 [0.4–2.3] 1.2 [0.8–1.9] 1.1 [0.5–2.3] 1.2 [0.8–1.8]
 Anticipated stigma Zero 1 1 1 1
One or more 1.7 [0.8–3.9] 1.4 [1.0–2.1] 1.5 [0.7–3.5] 1.4 [1.0–2.1]
 Enacted stigma Zero 1 1 1 1
One or more 1.4 [0.6–3.4] 1.4 [0.9–2.2] 1.3 [0.6–3.1] 1.3 [0.8–2.1]
Social cohesion
 Combined social cohesion score 0 to 9 (low cohesion) N/A N/A 1 1
10 to 11 (medium cohesion) 0.5 [0.2–1.2] 0.5* [0.2–0.6]
12 to 16 (high cohesion) 0.3 [0.1–0.5] 0.4 [0.2–0.6]

Model A shows multivariate association with HIV positivity when controlling for all demographic variables (presented in Table 4) and for stigma variables.

Model B shows multivariate association with HIV positivity when controlling for all demographic variables, social cohesion variables, and stigma variables.

*

P < .05.

P < .01.