Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 1;1(3):367–381. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0045

Table 3.

Effect of hybrid maturity class and harvest date on whole corn plant characteristics (yr 2)

Item Hybrid maturity class × Harvest1 SEM P-value2
MEM:1 MEM:2 MEM:3 MLM:1 MLM:2 MLM:3 F-test Int. Maturity Harvest
Plant DM, %3 39.28 48.54 60.81 35.50 47.15 57.54
Actual Population4 66975 66975 66975 67961 67961 67961 3076 1.00 1.00 0.09 NS
Grain Yield 11.84cd 12.55bc 12.92ab 11.45d 13.34ab 13.75a 0.25 <0.01 0.02 0.04 QMEM, LMLM
Corn Stover Yield5,6 9.69b 9.89b 9.77b 10.72a 10.08ab 9.62b 0.24 0.02 0.04 0.06 NSMEM, LMLM
Whole Plant Yield5,6 21.53 22.44 22.69 22.17 23.41 23.37 0.51 0.07 0.92 0.03 L
Grain, %6 54.79c 55.86bc 57.03b 51.49d 56.96b 58.91a 0.50 <0.01 <0.01 0.76 LMEM, QMLM
Residue NDF, % 61.27 64.32 63.11 65.40 68.10 67.96 0.60 <0.01 0.55 < 0.01 Q
Residue NDFD, %7 33.21b 32.12b 28.71c 37.88a 32.30b 27.76c 0.67 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 LMEM, MLM
Residue TDN, % 49.36 46.95 46.15 48.29 45.47 43.04 0.51 <0.01 0.08 < 0.01 L
Whole Plant TDN, % 73.30a 72.73ab 72.84ab 71.26c 72.57b 72.51b 0.26 <0.01 <0.01 < 0.01 QMEM,MLM
TDN yield/ha8 15.78 16.48 16.53 15.87 17.01 16.95 0.40 0.12 0.72 0.23 L
a–d

Means with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

1

MEM = moderately early maturity, MLM = moderately late maturity; harvest dates: 1 = August 23, 2012; 2 = September 6, 2012; 3 = September 24, 2012.

2

F-test = overall F-test, Int = Interaction between hybrid maturity class and harvest, Maturity = P-value for the hybrid maturity class effect, Harvest = orthogonal contrast P-value for the harvest effect; NS = not significant (P > 0.05), L = linear response (P < 0.05), Q = quadratic response (P < 0.05).

3

Average plant DM as a reference for each hybrid maturity class × Harvest combination (no data available for harvest 3).

4

Actual population in plants/ha.

5

Yield in t/ha.

6

Harvest Index, DM basis.

7

Residue in-situ NDF digestibility.

8

TDN yield/ha (t of TDN/ha) = whole plant TDN × whole plant yield.