Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 1;1(3):367–381. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0045

Table 5.

Effect of hybrid maturity class and population on whole corn plant characteristics (yr 2)

Item Hybrid maturity class × Population1 SEM P-value2
MEM:49,421 MEM:69,189 MEM:88,958 MEM:108,726 MLM:49,421 MLM:69,189 MLM:88,958 MLM:108,726 F-test Int. Maturity Population
Actual Population 3 43892e 58125d 72715c 93167a 45208e 59798d 75586b 91253a 801 <0.01 0.02 0.09 QMEM, LMLM
Grain Yield 10.12e 12.38c 13.43ab 13.81a 11.40d 12.88bc 13.56ab 13.54ab 0.31 <0.01 0.04 0.04 QMEM, MLM
Corn Stover Yield 4,5 8.92 10.11 9.84 10.27 9.75 9.93 10.22 10.65a 0.27 <0.01 0.32 0.06 L
Whole Plant Yield 4,5 19.05 22.49 23.27 24.08 21.15 22.81 23.79 24.19a 0.51 <0.01 0.18 0.03 Q
Grain, % 5 53.18e 55.12cd 57.86a 57.41ab 53.84de 56.45abc 56.99abc 55.88bc 0.67 <0.01 0.02 0.76 QMEM, MLM
Residue NDF, % 60.29d 61.28d 63.70c 66.34b 64.17c 67.39ab 68.08a 68.97a 0.61 <0.01 0.02 < 0.01 LMEM, QMLM
Residue NDFD, % 6 32.57 31.66 29.98 31.24 33.52 32.09 31.58 33.03 1.00 0.25 0.83 0.01 Q
Residue TDN, % 48.74 48.41 46.98 45.99 47.14 45.45 44.94 44.72 0.66 <0.01 0.48 < 0.01 L
Whole Plant TDN, % 72.27 73.00 73.65 72.91 71.88 72.48 72.38 71.78 0.30 <0.01 0.33 < 0.01 Q
TDN yield/ha 7 13.77 16.50 17.13 17.60 15.30 16.51 17.24 17.39 0.41 <0.01 0.12 0.23 Q
a–d

Means with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).

1

MEM = moderately early maturity, MLM = moderately late maturity; harvest dates: 1 = August 23, 2012; 2 = September 6, 2012; 3 = September 24, 2012.

2

F-test = overall F-test, Int = Interaction between hybrid maturity class and harvest, Maturity = P-value for the hybrid maturity class effect, Harvest = orthogonal contrast P-value for the harvest effect; NS = not significant (P > 0.05), L = linear response (P < 0.05), Q = quadratic response (P < 0.05).

3

Actual population in plants/ha.

4

Yield in t/ha.d

5

Harvest Index, DM basis.

6

Residue in-situ NDF digestibility.

7

TDN yield/ha (t of TDN/ha) = whole plant TDN × whole plant yield.