Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 4;140(3):201–209. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09733-3

Table 1.

ERG results and differences of two DTL electrode positions

Lower lid Fornix P value
Median [IQR] Median [IQR]
a-wave amplitude*
 0.3 − 11.8 [-15.5, − 8.1] − 10.1 [− 13.0, − 7.4] < 0.001***
 1.0 − 19.4 [− 25.1, − 14.3] − 16.3 [− 20.1, − 11.9] < 0.001***
 3.0 − 29.7 [− 37.8, − 22.2] − 24.9 [− 30.5, − 19.8] < 0.001***
 10.0 − 46.1 [− 57.2, − 35.4] − 37.4 [− 45.9, − 31.4] < 0.001***
a-wave implicit time*
 0.3 19.0 [18.2, 20.0] 18.9 [18.0, 20.1] 0.445
 1.0 17.1 [16.4, 18.0] 17.1 [16.3, 17.8] 0.115
 3.0 15.7 [15.1, 16.4] 15.8 [15.1, 16.5] 0.816
 10.0 14.8 [14.3, 15.5] 14.8 [14.2, 15.5] 0.119
b-wave amplitude*
 0.3 33.3 [23.3, 42.0] 26.2 [20.4, 34.6] < 0.001***
 1.0 76.0 [55.5, 97.6] 63.1 [49.9, 82.4] < 0.001***
 3.0 119.8 [92.2, 151.7] 103.2 [81.7, 129.1] < 0.001***
 10.0 118.4 [93.0, 144.6] 105.0 [82.6, 122.8] < 0.001***
b-wave implicit time*
 0.3 27.0 [25.8, 30.0] 27.2 [25.6, 29.9] 0.718
 1.0 28.9 [27.8, 31.0] 28.8 [27.7, 30.8] 0.105
 3.0 31.6 [30.7, 33.0] 31.6 [30.7, 33.0] 0.129
 10.0 35.9 [34.8, 37.3] 36.0 [34.7, 37.2] 0.055
30 Hz flicker peak
 Amplitude 67.1 [47.2, 86.3] 58.0 [43.9, 74.7] < 0.001***
 Implicit time 29.1 [27.5, 31.3] 29.1 [27.6, 31.3] 0.461

Descriptive statistics of the ERG responses of the two DTL positions (LLP and FP)

*Results of different flash strengths in candela. seconds/meters squared of the light-adapted ERG

***Statistically significant

ERG Electroretinogram, DTL Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode, IQR interquartile range, LLP lower lid position, FP fornix position