Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;146:1–35. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.146.52114

Table 3.

Differentiating features of Michelia hunanensis, M. maudiae and M. cavaleriei.

Plant feature Michelia hunanensis C.L. Peng & L.H. Yan Michelia maudiae Dunn Michelia cavaleriei Finet & Gagnep.
maximum height 20 m 31 m§ 10 m¶¶
indumentum of buds greyish-pilose glabrous (covered with white powder††) silver-grey or rufous appressed pilose¶¶
leaf shape oblong or broadly oblong oblong-elliptic or occasionally ovate-elliptic†† narrowly oblanceolate-oblong or narrowly oblong¶¶
leaf dimensions 13–33 × 6–9 cm 7–18 × 3.5–8.5 cm†† 10–20 × 3.5–6.5 cm¶¶
leaf apex cuspidate obtuse acuminate (occasionally long-acuminate) acuminate or short-acute¶¶
leaf base rounded or obtuse acute or cuneate cuneate or broadly cuneate¶¶
undersides of leaves greyish pubescent glabrous, as is the entire plant††, except for the silky grey pubescent stamens# glaucous and silver-grey or rufous appressed pilose when young¶¶)
lateral leaf veins 8–14 pairs 8–12 pairs 11–15 pairs§§
petiole length and indumentum 2–3.5 cm, pilose 2.5–3 cm, glabrous (1–3 cm‡‡) 2 cm, puberulus (0.7–1.5 cm)##, silver-grey or rufous appressed pilose¶¶
tepal number 9 9–11‡‡ 10–12##
tepal shape and size (outer 3) obovate, 6–7 cm long
(width not specified)
obovate,
5–7 × 3.5–4 cm††
obovate-elliptic (2.5–4 cm long¶¶)
tepal shape and size (inner 3) obovate-lanceolate, 4–4.8 × 1.2–1.4 cm obovate, elliptic to broadly spathulate, 4.5–5 × 1.8–2.5 cm obovate-elliptic, 2.5 × 1.5 cm
length of stamens ca. 1cm 1.5–2.2 cm 1.2–1.4 cm§§
gynoecium length, shape and indumentum 1 cm, cylindric, pubescent 1.5–1.8 cm (1.0–1.3 cm, subcylindric), glabrous 1 cm, narrowly ovate, with a few hairs only near the carpel apex
gynophore length 5–8 mm ca. 10 mm ca. 4 mm§§
fruit aggregate length 8–17 cm 10–12(–14) cm 5–10 cm¶¶
flowering period March–April January–March†† March§§, ¶¶
fruiting period August–September October–November†† September–October§§,¶¶

The distinguishing features of Michelia hunanensis are cited from Peng et al. (1995). Those of M. maudiae are cited from Dunn (1908), supplemented by Chen and Nooteboom (1993:1072), Deng and Yang (2015: 157)§, Law et al. (1996: 179), Lee (1935: 487)#, Liu et al. (2004: 290)†† and Yang et al. (2016: 295)‡‡, with those of M. cavaleriei from Finet and Gagnepain (1906), supplemented by Law et al. (1996: 184)§§, Liu et al. (2004: 229)¶¶ and Yang et al. (2016: 239)##.