Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD006562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006562.pub2

Comparison 4. 5‐FU versus CO2 Laser.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
4.1 Treatement failure 1 289 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.47, 0.93]
4.1.1 CA plus CP 1 49 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.43, 1.11]
4.1.2 CA 1 45 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.27, 1.98]
4.1.3 CP 1 195 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.34, 1.07]