Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD006562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006562.pub2

Comparison 5. 5‐FU versus 5‐FU + INFα‐2a (Low Dose).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
5.1 Treatment Failure 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1.1 CA plus CP 1 244 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.87, 1.19]
5.1.2 CA 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.76, 1.37]
5.1.3 CP 1 174 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.77, 1.10]