Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD006562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006562.pub2

Comparison 8. CO2 Laser versus CO2 Laser + 5‐FU 5%.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
8.1 Recurrence of Lesion 1 68 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.70, 1.34]