Table 3.
Performance comparison on DS2 of MIT-BIH-AR
| Method | ACC | N | S | V | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REC | PRE | F1 | REC | PRE | F1 | REC | PRE | F1 | ||
| DDCNN + CLSM | 95.1 | 97.5 | 97.6 | 97.6 | 83.8 | 59.4 | 69.5 | 80.4 | 90.2 | 85.0 |
| DDCNN Only | 93.4 | 97.9 | 95.7 | 96.7 | 13.2 | 20.7 | 16.1 | 87.2 | 87.7 | 87.5 |
| DDCNN Only (without Concat) | 85.9 | 90.2 | 95.9 | 93.0 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 82.4 | 46.3 | 59.2 |
| Acharya [1] | 71.3 | 73.3 | 95.0 | 82.6 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 90.8 | 28.2 | 43.5 |
| De Chazal [6] | 81.9 | 86.9 | 99.2 | 92.6 | 75.9 | 38.5 | 51.1 | 77.7 | 81.9 | 80.0 |
| Ye [14] | 86.4 | 88.5 | 97.5 | 92.8 | 60.8 | 52.3 | 56.3 | 81.5 | 63.1 | 71.2 |
| Zhang [17] | 86.7 | 88.9 | 99.0 | 93.7 | 79.1 | 36.0 | 49.5 | 85.5 | 92.8 | 89.0 |
| Shan [4] | 93.1 | 98.4 | 95.4 | 96.9 | 29.5 | 38.4 | 33.4 | 70.8 | 85.1 | 77.3 |
| Mariano [10] | 78.0 | 78.0 | 99.1 | 87.3 | 76.0 | 41.0 | 53.3 | 83.0 | 88.0 | 85.4 |
Results in this table are presented in percentage (%), which are obtained on DS2 of MIT-BIH-AR following the same evaluation procedures.