Table 2.
Results of multivariable simultaneous quantile regression analysis for under-five child severe stunting
| Variables | Quantile = 0.1 | Quantile = 0.2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | p-value | β | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Child characteristics | ||||||
| Type of birth | ||||||
| Single | ref | ref | ||||
| Multiple | −0.849 | (−1.202, − 0.53) | < 0.001*** | − 0.847 | (− 1.044, − 0.55) | < 0.001*** |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | ref | ref | ||||
| Female | 0.172 | (0.052, 0.267) | 0.013* | 0.153 | (0.062, 0.227) | 0.01* |
| Age (months) | −0.015 | (− 0.021, − 0.009) | < 0.001*** | − 0.015 | (− 0.018, − 0.011) | < 0.001*** |
| Had diarrhoea | ||||||
| No | ref | ref | ||||
| Yes | −0.149 | (− 0.345, − 0.029) | 0.196 | − 0.16 | (− 0.353, − 0.012) | 0.08 |
| Place of delivery | ||||||
| Health facility | ref | ref | ||||
| Home | −0.199 | (− 0.358, − 0.046) | 0.02* | −0.179 | (− 0.298, − 0.096) | 0.007** |
| Size at birth | ||||||
| Large/average | ref | ref | ||||
| Small | −0.339 | (− 0.537, − 0.18) | < 0.001*** | −0.373 | (− 0.485, − 0.269) | < 0.001*** |
| Maternal/Household | ||||||
| Maternal age | 0.016 | (0.006, 0.027) | 0.021* | 0.024 | (0.016, 0.033) | < 0.001*** |
| Children < 5 years | − 0.192 | (− 0.352, − 0.034) | 0.038* | −0.224 | (− 0.343, − 0.13) | 0.005** |
| Health insurance | ||||||
| Had no health insurance | ref | ref | ||||
| Had health insurance | 0.237 | (0.131, 0.386) | 0.002** | 0.304 | (0.21, 0.388) | < 0.001*** |
| Wealth status | ||||||
| Average/ rich | ref | ref | ||||
| Poor | −0.259 | (−0.398, −0.12) | 0.001** | −0.281 | (− 0.371, − 0.183) | < 0.001*** |
| Maternal education | ||||||
| Primary/higher | ref | ref | ||||
| No formal education | −0.358 | (− 0.556, − 0.223) | < 0.001*** | −0.256 | (− 0.349, − 0.124) | 0.001** |
β: coefficient of parameter. CI: confidence interval. *: p-value < 0.05. **: p-value< 0.01. ***: p-value < 0.001. ref.: reference category
Note: The DHS categorises the wealth index as poorest, poor, middle, richer and richest. However, in this work, we combined poorest and poorer as poor. Also, middle, richer and richest were combined as average/rich. Similar recoding was done for size at birth, place of delivery and maternal education