. 2020 Apr 29;2020:8685436. doi: 10.34133/2020/8685436

Table 3.

Comparison of composite structures of B-d-CMs and their electrochemical performance in various EES devices.

Sample	Biomass materials	Structure	Energy applications	Capacity (low current density)	Capacity (high current density)	Ref.
MnO₂/C	Natural flax fiber	Fibrous	Supercapacitors	683.73 F g⁻¹ (2 a g⁻¹)	269.04 F g⁻¹ (300 a g⁻¹)	[154]
Fe₃O₄/C	Watermelon	3D porous	Supercapacitors	333.1 F g⁻¹ (1 A g⁻¹)	—	[155]
Co₃O₄/C	Dextran	Nanopetal like	Supercapacitors	400 F g⁻¹ (0.5 A g⁻¹)	175 F g⁻¹ (2 a g⁻¹)	[156]
MnO₂/C	Hemp stem	3D hierarchical porous	Supercapacitors	340 F g⁻¹ (1 a g⁻¹)	300 F g⁻¹ (30 a g⁻¹)	[157]
MnO₂/C	Banana peel	Hierarchical porous	Supercapacitors	139.6 F g⁻¹ (300 mA g⁻¹)	70 F g⁻¹ (10 a g⁻¹)	[158]
Co₃O₄/C/Co₃O₄	Raw cotton	Sandwich like	Supercapacitors	892 F g⁻¹ (0.5 a g⁻¹)	102 F g⁻¹ (2.0 a g⁻¹)	[159]
MoS₂/C	Paper towel	3D hierarchical porous	SIBs	446 mAh g⁻¹ (20 mA g⁻¹)	102 mAh g⁻¹ (10 a g⁻¹)	[161]
Ni-doped CoS₂/N,P-doped C	Yeast cells	Spherical	SIBs	407 mAh g⁻¹ (100 mA g⁻¹)	243 mAh g⁻¹ (1000 mA g⁻¹)	[164]
FeS/C	Fe-carrageenan fibers	Fibrous	Li-S batteries	283 mAh g⁻¹ (1 A g⁻¹)	247 mAh g⁻¹ (5 a g⁻¹)	[162]
Fe₃C/C	Corncobs	Nanosheet	Li-S batteries	1530 mAh g⁻¹ (0.1 C)	699 mAh g⁻¹ (0.5 C)	[167]