Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2018 Nov 22;2(3):214–221. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1062

Table 2.

Summary of Survey Responses Sorted by Clinical Service

Cardiology Psychiatry Pain Infectious Diseases Oncology Transplant Primary Care Neurology
PharmD (n=9) (%) MD (n=8) (%) PharmD (n=5) (%) MD (n=9) (%) PharmD (n=9) (%) MD (n=11) (%) PharmD (n=12) (%) MD (n=5) (%) PharmD (n=7) (%) MD (n=9) (%) PharmD (n=16) (%) MD (n=11) (%) PharmD (n=12) (%) MD (n=16) (%) PharmD (n=7) (%) MD (n=4) (%)
Currently using PG testing in practice 3 (37) 0 (0) 2 (40) 2 (22) 3 (33) 3 (27) 6 (50) 4 (80) 2 (29) 7 (78) 7 (44) 3 (27) 4 (33) 3 (19) 1 (17) 1 (25)
Interest in starting PG testing in practice 5 (62) 8 (100) 3 (60) 7 (78) 6 (67) 8 (73) 6 (50) 1 (20) 5 (71) 2 (22) 9 (56) 8 (73) 8 (67) 13 (81) 5 (83) 3 (75)
Observational studies sufficient evidence for PG testing 8 (89) 4 (50) 4 (80) 3 (33) 4 (44) 9 (82) 8 (67) 4 (80) 4 (57) 9 (100) 13 (81) 7 (64) 10 (83) 9 (56) 7 (100) 3 (75)

All the pharmacists whom responded to the survey selected more than one clinical specialty in the survey.

PG = pharmacogenetics.