Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2018 Nov 22;2(3):214–221. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1062

Table 4.

Barriers to PG Testing Identified by UCSF Health Physicians and Pharmacists Sorted From Highest to Lowest Number of Times Selected by Both Clinicians (i.e., Combined)

Barriers Physicians n=76 (%) Pharmacists n=59 (%) Combined N=135 (%)
Lack of established and clear guidelines/protocols for translating test results 51 (67) 41 (69) 92 (68)
Cost/payer’s restrictions on reimbursement for PG testing 48 (63) 32 (54) 80 (59)
Limited professional education in PG 43 (57) 37 (63) 80 (59)
Limited internal UCSF PG testing options 32 (42) 27 (46) 59 (44)
Ordering PG testing is not easy 36 (47) 22 (37) 58 (43)
Turnaround time on PG testing is not practical 21 (28) 33 (56) 54 (40)
Lack of a UCSF PG consultation service 26 (34) 23 (39) 49 (36)
Lack of point-of-care electronic clinical decision support to utilize PG tests 28 (37) 19 (32) 47 (34)
Limited scientific evidence linking test results to health outcomes 24 (32) 18 (31) 42 (31)
Diagnostic tests are not FDA-approved 13 (17) 6 (10) 19 (14)
There are no barriers for my practice/service. We are using the test 7 (9) 3 (5) 10 (7)
Patients do not want PG testing 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1)

FDA = Food and Drug Administration; PG = pharmacogenetic; UCSF = University of California, San Francisco.