Table 2.

Smoking Urge and Desire Change Scores

Primary study outcomes (N = 108)
Outcome	(Mean, SEM)			Pairwise comparisons
	Water cue	Active cue	Post cue
BQSUa
Vape pen cue	+0.9 (0.8)	+3.3 (1.0)	+3.7 (1.2)	(A = P) > W***
Cigarette cue	+0.1 (1.0)	+5.1 (1.4)	+3.7 (1.4)	(A = P) > W***
Desire for a cigarette
Vape pen cue	+2.8 (1.6)	+7.8 (2.0)	+9.0 (2.4)	(A = P) > W***
Cigarette cue	−1.9 (2.2)	+7.9 (2.7)	+6.7 (2.8)	(A = P) > W***
Desire for an e-cigarette
Vape pen cue	+0.1 (1.6)	+7.9 (2.3)	+7.3 (2.1)	(A = P) > W***
Cigarette cue	−2.1 (1.8)	+2.7 (2.7)	+2.5 (3.0)	(A = P) > W***
Primary study outcomes in subset of daily smokers exposed to vape pen cue (n = 42) vs. prior study cigalike cue (n = 30)b
BQSU
Vape pen cue	+0.7 (1.0)	+3.9 (1.2)	+3.8 (1.5)	(A = P) > W**
Cigalike cue	−1.3 (1.5)	+2.5 (1.4)	+2.9 (1.6)	(A = P) > W**
Desire for a cigarette
Vape pen cue	+4.1 (1.7)	+8.9 (2.2)	+9.5 (2.5)	(A = P) > W**
Cigalike cue	+0.6 (2.9)	+8.7 (2.6)	+10.3 (2.6)	(A = P) > W***
Desire for an e-cigarette
Vape pen cue	−1.4 (1.9)	+7.6 (2.4)	+7.0 (2.0)	(A = P) > W**
Cigalike cue	+5.4 (2.9)	+18.5 (5.6)	+20.3 (5.8)	(A = P) > W**

Data are Mean (SEM). Statistical analyses from generalized estimating equations withp values for main effects of cue type, time and their interaction.

^aBQSU = Brief Questionnaire of Smoking Urges.

^bCigalike cue group from our prior study (n = 30)²⁸ .

**p < .01, ***p < .001 post hoc pairwise comparisons of main effects of time, for all (active cue = post active cue) > water cue.