Table 1.
Study Design | Patient Population | Endpoint | BPE threshold | Findings | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
King, et al., 2011 (8) | Retrospective case control, 38 cancers matched 1:2 to negative control and 1:1 to false positive control | High risk screening | Risk of breast cancer diagnosis at time of MRI | ≥ moderate threshold at first time point (k0 not reported) | Increased BPE associated with cancer |
Dontchos, et al., 2015 (87) | Retrospective case control, 23 cancers matched 1:1 to negative control | High risk screening | Risk of either cancer diagnosis at time of MRI or in future | ≥ mild threshold at first time point (k0 = 90–110s) | Increased BPE associated with cancer |
Telegrafo, et al., 2015 (89) | Retrospective cohort | High risk screening and diagnostic (problem solving and extent of disease) | Risk of breast cancer diagnosis at time of MRI | ≥ moderate threshold at third time point (k0 = 180s) | Increased BPE associated with cancer |
Bennani-Baiti, et al., 2016 (86) | Retrospective cohort | Diagnostic (problem solving and extent of disease) | Risk of breast cancer diagnosis at time of MRI | ≥ moderate threshold (k0 = 120s) | No association of BPE with cancer |
Grimm, et al., 2018 (88) | Retrospective case control, 61 cancers matched 1:2 to negative control | High risk screening | Risk of future breast cancer diagnosis | ≥ mild threshold (k0 not reported) | Increased BPE associated with breast cancer diagnosis |
Arasu, et al., 2019 (90) | Retrospective cohort | Screening and Diagnostic | Risk of future breast cancer diagnosis | ≥ mild threshold (k0 not reported due to numerous institutions included) | Increased BPE associated with breast cancer diagnosis; effect greater for invasive breast cancers than DCIS |
BPE = background parenchymal enhancement; DCIS = ductal carcinoma in situ