Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Apr 19;51(1):43–61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26762

Table 1.

Studies evaluating association of qualitative background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) levels with breast cancer risk.

Study Design Patient Population Endpoint BPE threshold Findings
King, et al., 2011 (8) Retrospective case control, 38 cancers matched 1:2 to negative control and 1:1 to false positive control High risk screening Risk of breast cancer diagnosis at time of MRI ≥ moderate threshold at first time point (k0 not reported) Increased BPE associated with cancer
Dontchos, et al., 2015 (87) Retrospective case control, 23 cancers matched 1:1 to negative control High risk screening Risk of either cancer diagnosis at time of MRI or in future ≥ mild threshold at first time point (k0 = 90–110s) Increased BPE associated with cancer
Telegrafo, et al., 2015 (89) Retrospective cohort High risk screening and diagnostic (problem solving and extent of disease) Risk of breast cancer diagnosis at time of MRI ≥ moderate threshold at third time point (k0 = 180s) Increased BPE associated with cancer
Bennani-Baiti, et al., 2016 (86) Retrospective cohort Diagnostic (problem solving and extent of disease) Risk of breast cancer diagnosis at time of MRI ≥ moderate threshold (k0 = 120s) No association of BPE with cancer
Grimm, et al., 2018 (88) Retrospective case control, 61 cancers matched 1:2 to negative control High risk screening Risk of future breast cancer diagnosis ≥ mild threshold (k0 not reported) Increased BPE associated with breast cancer diagnosis
Arasu, et al., 2019 (90) Retrospective cohort Screening and Diagnostic Risk of future breast cancer diagnosis ≥ mild threshold (k0 not reported due to numerous institutions included) Increased BPE associated with breast cancer diagnosis; effect greater for invasive breast cancers than DCIS

BPE = background parenchymal enhancement; DCIS = ductal carcinoma in situ