Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;40(3):388–400. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2020.e19

Table 3. Effect of pomegranate peel powder, pomegranate aril bagasse powder, and their aqueous extracts on proximate composition of chicken meat patties.

Treatments Moisture (%) Protein (%) Fat (%) Ash (%) Crude fibre (%)
Control 60.08±0.97a 17.08±0.80a 16.58±0.39b 1.73±0.24b 0.26±0.13c
BHT 60.06±0.99a 16.76±0.99a 16.68±0.56b 1.70±0.12b 0.29±0.11c
PPP 58.61±1.21bc 16.61±0.95a 17.04±0.75ab 2.10±0.15a 0.60±0.10b
PABP 57.64±1.20c 17.15±1.36a 17.60±0.57a 2.15±0.14a 1.58±0.10a
PPAE 59.93±0.99a 16.89±1.18a 16.83±0.88ab 1.84±0.18ab 0.34±0.08c
PABAE 59.74±0.85ab 16.33±0.63a 16.96±0.63ab 1.85±0.26ab 0.35±0.08c

n=6, Mean±SD.

Means with different superscripts in a column differ significantly (p<0.05).

BHT, 100 ppm butylated hydroxytoluene; PPP, 2 g pomegranate peel powder; PABP, 4 g pomegranate aril bagasse powder; PPAE, 6 g pomegranate peel powder aqueous extract; PABAE, 9 g pomegranate aril bagasse powder aqueous extract.

Moisture, crude fat, crude protein, crude fibre and ash content for pomegranate fruit peel powder were 11.03%, 1.42%, 6.83%, 15.80%, respectively.

Moisture, crude fat, crude protein, crude fibre and ash content for pomegranate aril bagasse powder were 5.55%, 5.38%, 16.86%, 17.42%, 32.32%, and 3.22%, respectively.