Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jan 7;26(4):e77–e85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.771

Table 2.

Studies on alloHCT for DLBCL

EBMT 2011 (16) GITMO 2012 (17) CIBMTR 2013 (84) MAC/RIC CIBMTR 2016 (3) EBMT 2010-R-12 (18) MAC / RIC CIBMTR/EBM T LY16-03 (20) MRD / MUD TCD+ / MUD TCD-/haplo DSHNHL 2004-R3 NCT007853 30 (26)

Study type Registry retrospective Registry retrospective Registry retrospective Registry retrospective Registry retrospective Registry retrospective Phase 2 Prospective
Indication autoHCT failure autoHCT failure Refractory disease autoHCT failure DLBCL,alloHCT as 1st HCT (prior autoHCT excluded) DLBCL, 1st alloHCT (prior autoHCT permitted) PIF, early relapse, autoHCT failure
N 101 165 533 (incl.80 FL3) 503 132 / 98 1306 525 / 403 / 378/132 84*
Period 1997–2006 1995–2008 1998–2010 2000–2012 2002–2010 2008–2015 2004–2009
Age (years; median (range)) 46 (19–66) 43 (16–65) 46 (19–66) / 53 (20-70) 52 (19–72) 42 (31–50) / 52 (43-57) 55 (19–75) 48 (38–57)
PS >1 (ECOG) or <90% (Karnofsk y) 2% n.a. n.a. 10% § 16% / 19% 38%/38%/43%/27% 8%§
Prior autoHCT 100% 100% 15% / 38% 100% 0% 55%/59%/61%/42% 46%
Disease status refractory 26% 33% 100% 21% 46% / 32% 21%/18%/17%/17% 55%
Unrelated donor 29% 35% 34% / 53% 50% 37% / 34% 0%/100%/100%/0% 57%
Conditioning regimen RIC or NMA 64% 70% 43% 100% 0% / 100% 100% 0%
Nonrelapse mortality 16% n.a. 38% / 25% 12% 10% / 5% n.a. 12%
  100 25% 23% 20% / 16% 13%/21%/20%/16% 35%
d 28% 47% / 36% 30%
  1y
  3y
53% / 42% 23% / 17% 17%/26%/30%/22%
Relapse incidence 27% / 46% / 39%/33%/28%/3
  1y 24% n.a. 32% 33% 46% 4% 29%
  3y 30% 28% / 35% 38% 47% / 51% 47%/38%/34%/4 1% 29%
Progressi on-free survival 52% 48% 26% / 32% 44% 34% / 38% 48%/46%/52%/50% 45%
  1y 42% 34% 31% 39%
  3y 23% 27% 19% / 23% HR 2.04 (vs CR) 30% / 33% 37%/36%/37%/38%
  3y 19% / 23% n.a.
(if refractory at HCT)
Overall survival
  1y 65% 55% 31% / 42% 54% 39% / 50% 65%/56%/63%/66% 52%
  3y 52% 42% 19% / 28% 37% 32% / 40% 50%/43%/46%/46% 42%
Risk factors for PFS/OS Time to rel after auto <12mo / = Time to rel after auto <12mo / Refractory at HCT, MUD DLBCL (vs FL3) Refractory at HCT, poor PS, MAC / Refractory at HCT, poor PS, MAC, Time auto_allo <12mo n.a. Refractory at HCT, poor PS / Refractory at HCT, poor PS, age, HCT-CI n.a. / refractory at HCT, no ATG, >4 lines of pretreatme nt, mismatche d donor
Grade 2-4 (3-4) acute GVHD 33% (n.a.) 29% (10%) 29% / 31% 36% (15%) n.a. 32%/32%/42%/34%
(11%/13%/19%/7%)
30% (n.a.)
Extensive chronic GVHD 17% n.a. n.a. 33% n.a. n.a. 33%-41% (3y)
  1y
Follow-up (months) 36 (3–112) 39 (1–144) 35 / 30 55 (11–49) 36 (9–68) 49 (12–73) 48 (29–71)

*

includes 27% patients with T cell lymphoma

§

Karnofky <80%

ATG, anti-thymocyte globuline; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; HCT-CI, hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; MUD, matched unrelated donor, n.a., not available; PS, performance status; RIC, reduced intensity conditioning; TCD, T-cell depletion