Burke 1997.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial Sample size calculation | |
Participants | 50 children with chronic illness/physical disability for at least 8 months Age 1 to 17 (mean 6.2 years, SD 4.7) 26 boys (52%), 24 girls (48%) Follow up 96% at 3 months | |
Interventions | Stress point intervention vs usual care | |
Outcomes | Scales of Independent Behaviour
Vernon Post‐hospital Behaviour Questionnaire
State‐trait Anxiety Inventory
Feetham Family Functioning Survey
Coping Health Inventory for Parents 2 weeks and 3 months post intervention |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: Method of random sequence generation not mentioned. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote; "A secretary blind to study details randomly assigned children to experimental or control groups within age and diagnosis strata." |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: " Participants, clinic staff, hospital staff and research assistants were blind to group membership". |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | As above |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | As above |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: outcome data were reported for all participants. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: outcome data were presented for all reported outcomes as measured. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: none were identified. |