Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD007303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007303.pub2
Two‐stage meta‐analysis based on random‐effects Cox model ESA versus control
HR (95% CI)
 
P value N included
Chemotherapy trials
Analysis restricted to studies reporting chemotherapy status of each patient during ESA study 1.08 (0.95‐1.24) 0.242 8732
Analysis restricted to patients who actually received chemotherapy (subsets included: “chemotherapy”) 1.10 (0.96‐1.27) 0.172 8481
Analysis restricted to patients who actually received chemotherapy AND ESA in active arm AND no ESA in control arm (subsets included: “chemotherapy”) 1.09 (0.94‐1.26) 0.257 8114
Chemotherapy and mixed trials
Analysis restricted to studies reporting chemotherapy status of each patient during ESA study 1.09 (0.96‐1.25) 0.199 8998
Analysis restricted to patients who actually received chemotherapy (subsets included: “chemotherapy” and “mixed”) 1.12 (0.97‐1.28) 0.112 8651
 
Analysis restricted to patients who actually received chemotherapy AND ESA in active arm AND no ESA in control arm (subsets included: “chemotherapy” and “mixed”) 1.10 (0.96‐1.27) 0.173 8284
Chemotherapy, mixed and radiochemotherapy trials
Analysis restricted to studies reporting chemotherapy status of each patient during ESA study 1.11 (0.96‐1.27) 0.153 9661
Analysis restricted to patients who actually received chemotherapy (subsets: “chemotherapy”, “mixed” and “radiochemotherapy”) 1.14 (1.00‐1.30) 0.051 9307
Analysis restricted to patients who actually received chemotherapy AND ESA in active arm AND no ESA in control arm (subsets included: “chemotherapy”, “mixed” “radiochemotherapy”) 1.12 (0.98‐1.28) 0.101 8919