Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub2

Loh 2007a.

Methods Cluster randomised controlled trial (unit of randomisation = physician).
Participants Primary care patients newly diagnosed with depression (PHQ). Around two thirds of the participants were female. The average age of the control group was around 41 years (SD 13) and the average age of the intervention group was around 49 years (SD 17)
Interventions Patient ‐ Decision board for use during consultation that was handed out to the patients to take away.  Printed patient information that combined evidence‐based knowledge about depression care with specific encouragement for patients to be active in the decision‐making process.
Physician ‐ Modules on guideline concordant depression care. Enhancing skills for involving patients in the decision making process.  Facilitation practice, role playing and video examples of high quality decision making.  Standardized case vignettes. 5 scheduled training events over a 6 month period.
Outcomes Patient participation doctor facilitation (PICS‐DF, validated Lerman 1990).
Patient participation information seeking (PICS‐IS, validated Lerman 1990).
Patient participation Man‐Song‐Hing Scale (Man‐Song‐Hing 1999).
Consultation time.
Levels of Depression (measured by PHQ 9 Spitzer 1999).
Patient satisfaction (ZUF‐8 German version of the CSQ ‐ validated, Schmidt 1989).
Patient assessment of treatment adherence (1 question on a 5‐point Likert scale).
Physician assessment of treatment adherence (1 question on a 5‐point Likert scale).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Physicians drew blinded lots.
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Randomisation was at physician level. Adequate allocation concealment at the level of the patient would not be possible for new patients, acceptable for existing patients.
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk Providers were not blinded, participants were blind and outcome assessors and data analysts were not blind (this information was provided by the investigators).
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Significant loss to follow up.