Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroepidemiology. 2020 Jan 31;54(3):272–280. doi: 10.1159/000505874

Table 3:

Harmane and mercury concentrations by tremor diagnosis

ET (all) Definite ET Probable ET Possible ET Control
N 26 3 12 11 196
Harmane 1.74
[2.32 ± 2.05]
p = 0.92
4.13
[4.86 ± 3.86]
p = 0.126
2.28
[2.35 ± 1.82]
p = 0.91
1.27
[1.60 ± 1.18]
p = 0.28
1.53
[2.51 ± 2.29]
Log Harmane 0.24
[0.21 ± 0.40]
p = 0.92
0.62
[0.58 ± 0.40]
p = 0.126
0.36
[0.23 ± 0.40]
p = 0.91
0.10
[0.09 ± 0.37]
p = 0.28
0.19
[0.25 ± 0.37]
Mercury 10.11
[17.30 ± 17.78]
p = 0.86
11.41
[10.49 ± 8.22]
p = 0.64
11.30
[21.31 ± 20.77]
p = 0.51
8.40
[14.80 ± 16.19]
p = 0.86
11.36
[16.18 ± 17.41]

ET = essential tremor.

Values are median [mean ± standard deviation].

Harmane was in g−10/ml and mercury was in ng/ml.

All statistical tests are Mann-Whitney test compared to controls.

For comparison of harmane concentration in definite and probable ET (n = 15) vs. 196 controls, p = 0.44 (Mann-Whitney test); for comparison of mercury concentration in definite and probable ET (n = 15) vs. 196 controls, p = 0.70 (Mann-Whitney test).