Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 9;25(2):363–382. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09925-1

Table 2.

Item functioning statistics for the applicant group as a whole (n = 547) and differential item functioning assessed for gender, pu-GPA and age

Mean score% (SD) Guessing parametera Slipping parameterb Item-total correlation Genderc
t (p value)
pu-GPAd
F (p value)
Agee
F (p value)
V-SJT
 1 64.06 (17.80) 0.30 0.99 0.04 2.02 (0.04)* 2.26 (0.13) 0.00 (0.98)
 2 62.01 (20.46) 0.28 0.22 0.22 2.66 (0.01)** 2.11 (0.15) 0.19 (0.66)
 3 60.46 (14.52) 0.19 0.00 0.21 − 0.68 (0.50) 4.24 (0.04)* 2.41 (0.12)
 4 72.30 (19.80) 0.44 0.00 0.17 1.35 (0.18) 3.03 (0.08) 0.79 (0.38)
 5 68.34 (20.68) 0.00 0.00 0.15 1.96 (0.05) 1.35 (0.25) 0.59 (0.44)
 6 75.88 (18.30) 0.00 0.18 0.23 1.14 (0.25) 10.09 (0.00)** 7.52 (0.01)**
 7 41.97 (19.46) 0.05 0.00 0.36 1.46 (0.15) 0.05 (0.83) 1.32 (0.25)
 8 41.43 (23.48) 0.03 0.00 0.44 1.01 (0.32) 0.11 (0.74) 0.54 (0.46)
 9 42.48 (30.91) 0.00 0.03 0.59 0.16 (0.87) 0.78 (0.38) 0.02 (0.90)
 10 29.43 (29.85) 0.05 0.00 0.43 0.98 (0.33) 0.55 (0.46) 0.41 (0.52)
 11 14.88 (23.08) 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.72 (0.47) 0.43 (0.52) 0.38 (0.54)
Written Aptitude Test
 1 48.74 (21.23) 0.38 0.44 0.21 − 2.81 (0.01)** 1.34 (0.25) 1.05 (0.31)
 2 44.66 (13.77) 0.42 0.36 0.20 − 0.33 (0.74) 0.93 (0.34) 10.54 (0.00)**
 3 61.29 (15.42) 0.01 0.04 0.21 1.01 (0.31) 0.95 (0.33) 0.43 (0.51)
 4 35.66 (30.07) 0.07 0.12 0.25 − 3.05 (0.00)** 3.97 (0.05)* 0.36 (0.55)
 5 40.35 (30.85) 0.26 0.55 0.17 − 1.29 (0.20) 2.31 (0.13) 0.42 (0.52)
 6 43.48 (16.44) 0.20 0.38 0.20 0.62 (0.54) 5.63 (0.02)* 2.60 (0.11)
 7 41.97 (19.46) 0.67 0.00 0.25 0.06 (0.95) 11.04 (0.00)** 0.28 (0.60)
 8 41.43 (23.48) 0.02 0.01 0.21 0.78 (0.44) 5.64 (0.02)* 0.74 (0.39)

*Significant at p < 0.05

**Significant at p < 0.01

aGuessing is the probability that a respondent responds correctly to the item although he or she has not mastered all the required attributes; analyzed using the G-DINA model with 0 is low and 1 is high

bSlipping is the probability that a respondent responds incorrectly to the item although he or she has mastered all required attributes; analyzed using the G-DINA model with 0 is low and 1 is high

cIndependent samples t-test with 0 = female, 1 = male; positive t-values represent higher mean scores for women than for men, negative t-values represent higher mean scores for men than for women

dLinear regression analysis with pu-GPA as independent variable and performance on each item as dependent variable. All significant results for pu-GPA are in favor of higher pu-GPAs

eLinear regression analysis with Age as independent variable and performance on each item as dependent variable; for item 6 on the V-SJT the older students had an advantage, while they had a disadvantage on item 2 of the written test