Table 2.
Site Characteristics of Burnout Clusters
| Characteristic | Burnout cluster | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (N = 56) | Medium (N = 41) | High (N = 22) | ||
| No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | ||
| Setting | < 0.01 | |||
| Rural | 2 (4%) | 10 (24%) | 7 (32%) | |
| Urban | 54 (96%) | 31 (76%) | 15 (68%) | |
| Teaching | < 0.01 | |||
| Yes | 45 (80%) | 19 (46%) | 4 (18%) | |
| No | 11 (20%) | 22 (54%) | 18 (82%) | |
| Region | 0.43 | |||
| Midwest | 16 (29%) | 9 (22%) | 5 (23%) | |
| Northeast | 14 (25%) | 5 (12%) | 2 (9%) | |
| South | 18 (32%) | 17 (41%) | 10 (45%) | |
| West | 8 (14%) | 10 (24%) | 5 (23%) | |
| Complexity | < 0.01 | |||
| Level 1 (most complex) | 46 (82%) | 28 (68%) | 9 (41%) | |
| Level 2 | 7 (13%) | 9 (22%) | 5 (23%) | |
| Level 3 (least complex) | 3 (5%) | 4 (10%) | 8 (36%) | |
| No. of patients/site | 0.07 | |||
| Q1—few | 4 (7%) | 5 (12%) | 7 (32%) | |
| Q2 | 12 (21%) | 14 (34%) | 6 (27%) | |
| Q3 | 19 (34%) | 10 (24%) | 6 (27%) | |
| Q4—most | 21 (38%) | 12 (29%) | 3 (14%) | |