Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 24;12:100273. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100273

Table 1.

Histomorphometric effects of Sr for different doses and calcium diets. At pharmacological doses and normal/supplemented calcium diets, Sr has not been shown to have a significant anabolic effect.

Article Subject Form of Sr Sr dose (mg/kg/day) Duration of treatment Calcium diet Effects
Marie et al. (1985) WT Rat SrCl2 316, 633.7 9 weeks 0.50% ↑ trabecular bone density and calcified bone growth (316 dose)
↓ serum calcium and 1,25-D, induced defective mineralization (633.7 dose)
Morohashi et al. (1994) WT Rat SrCO3 510 27 days 0.50% ↑ trabecular bone volume
↓ bone formation, bone resorption, calcium content in bone (−20%) and serum calcium
Marie and Hott (1986) WT Rat SrCl2 350 29 days 0.50% No significant effect on bone volume or bone mineral content
↑ osteoid surface by 10%
↓ number of active osteoclasts by 11%
Grynpas et al. (1996) WT Rat omitted 168 8 weeks 0.50% ↑ mineral bone volume by 17%
↑ number of bone-forming sites by 70%, with no adverse effect on mineralization
Grynpas and Marie (1990) WT rat SrCl2 316, 633.7 8 weeks 0.50% ↑ osteoid volume and bone mass with no effect on bone volume
↑ bone volume and parameters of bone formation, accompanied by defective bone mineralization
Ammann et al. (2004) WT rat SrRan 225, 450, 900 2 years 0.76% ↑ bone volume (625 and 900 doses)
↑maximal load (900 dose only)
Morohashi et al. (1995) OVX Rat SrCO3 50 2 weeks 0.50% ↓bone formation and bone resorption, but not completely back to sham levels.
No change in bone volume in any group.
Marie et al. (1993) OVX Rat SrRan 77, 154, 308 2 months 0.60% ↑ bone volume by 30–36%
↓ osteoclast number/ surface
no effect on osteoblast surface/number
Fuchs et al. (2008) OVX Rat SrRan 25, 150 90 days 0.1% or 1.19% (normal) No effect on bone volume, bone formation observed for either dose or calcium diet
↑ serum Sr and Sr accumulation in bone for low calcium diet
Arlot et al. (2007) Biopsies from PREVOS, STRATOS, SOTI and TROPOS SrRan 25 1–5
years
Normal +500 mg/day ↑ BMD and ↓ new fractures for all clinical trials
↑osteoblast surface and osteoid thickness
no effect on bone resorption was observeda
Chavassieux et al. (2014) Post-menopausal osteoporotic women Sr-Ran 25 6–12 months Normal +1000 mg/day ↓ mineralizing surface/bone surface (MS/BS)
no effect on resorption
↓ bone volume, trabecular thickness and trabecular number

↑ Increase ↓ Decrease

a

Only 4 paired treatment biopsies and 1 paired placebo biopsy performed.