Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;2020:6920943. doi: 10.1155/2020/6920943

Table 4.

Results of the heiQ-Program evaluation among persons with Parkinson's disease and care partners after participation in the National Parkinson Schoola,b.

Items (abridged) Persons with Parkinson's disease (n = 48) Care partners (n = 26) P-valuee
I will tell people that the NPS is very worthwhileb 5 (4–5) 5 (4.75–5) 0.349
The NPS has helped me set reasonable and achievable goalsb 4 (4–5) 5 (4–5) 0.073
I trust the information and advice given in the NPSb 5 (4–6) 5 (5–5) 0.649
NPS leaders were very well-organizedb 5 (4–5) 5 (4–6) 0.091
It was worth my time and effort to take part in the NPSb 5 (4–6) 5 (5–6) 0.405
Difficult topics and discussions were handled wellb 5 (4–5) 5 (5–6) 0.136
NPS content was very relevant to my situationb 5 (4–5) 5 (4–5) 0.309
Everyone had the chance to speak if they wanted tob 5 (5–6) 5.5 (5–6) 0.425
The group worked very well togetherb 5 (4–5) 5 (4.5–5.5) 0.158
My understanding of PD has improvedc,d 3 (2–3) 3 (2–3) 0.283
My expectations of the NPS were metc,d 3 (2–3) 3 (2–3) 0.177

aData are median (q1-q3). bPossible scores, 1–6 (1 = Totally disagree, 6 = Totally agree). cStudy specific items not included in the original heiQ-Program evaluation questionnaire. dPossible scores, 1–3 (1 = Disagree, 3 = Agree). eMann–Whitney U test.