Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;5(5):632–642. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.01.022

Table 2.

Pathologic features, according to immune-complex glomerulopathy not otherwise specified (ICG-NOS) group

Total (n = 28) Full-house (+IgG/+IgM/+IgA/+C3/+C1q)
(n = 3)
Quasi-full-house (+IgG/+C3/+C1q)
(n = 10)
IgA-rich (IgA-codominant)
(n = 3)
C1q-rich (−IgG/+C1q)
(n = 6)
C1q-poor (+IgG/−C1q)
(n = 6)
P value
Light microscopy
 Number of glomeruli, median (range) 16 (4–30) 20 (10–26) 17 (4–28) 14 (6–21) 16 (6–22) 15 (12–30) 0.34
 Glomerular injury pattern, n (%)a
 Mesangial hyperplasia-proliferation 18 (64) 2 (67) 5 (50) 1 (33) 5 (83) 5 (83) 0.40
 Capillary wall duplication 7 (25) 0 (0) 1 (10) 1 (33) 3 (50) 2 (33) 0.34
 Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis 7 (25) 1 (33) 3 (30) 1 (33) 1 (17) 1 (17) 0.94
 Normal 8 (29) 1 (33) 4 (40) 2 (67) 0 (0) 1 (17) 0.94
 % Global glomerulosclerosis, median (range) 5.5 (0–58) 0 (0–4) 9 (0–50) 7 (0–14) 7 (0–50) 4.5 (0–58) 0.53
 % Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, median (range) 10 (0–95) 0 (0–0) 13 (0–50) 17.5 (5–30) 20 (0–70) 15 (0–95) 0.50
 Histologic antibody-mediated rejection, n (%) 0.74
 Glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis 12 (43) 1 (33) 3 (30) 1 (33) 4 (67) 3 (50)
 Glomerulitis only 3 (11) 0 (0) 1 (10) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (33)
 Peritubular capillaritis only 5 (18) 1 (33) 2 (20) 1 (1) 1 (17) 0 (0)
 None 8 (29) 1 (33) 4 (40) 1 (33) 1 (17) 1 (17)
 Histologic T-cell–mediated rejection, n (%) 0.07
 Banff 1A 1 (4) 1 (33) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Borderline 9 (32) 0 (0) 5 (50) 1 (33) 3 (50) 0 (0)
 None 18 (64) 2 (67) 5 (50) 2 (67) 3 (50) 6 (100)
 No histologic rejection 8 (29) 1 (33) 2 (20) 1 (33) 1 (17) 1 (17) 0.74
Immunofluorescence microscopy
 IgG, median (range) 1.0 (0.0–4.0) 2.0 (2.0–4.0) 1.75 (0.5–2.0) 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 1.0 (1.0–3.0) 0.002
 IgA, median (range) 0.0 (0.0–3.0) 1.0 (0.5–3.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 3.0 (1.5–3.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.5) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) <0.001
 IgM, median (range) 1.0 (0.0–3.0) 2.5 (1.5–3.0) 1.0 (0.0–2.0) 0.5 (0.0–3.0) 1.0 (0.5–2.0) 0.8 (0.0–2.0) 0.08
 C1q, median (range) 1.0 (0.0–3.0) 2.5 (1.0–3.0) 1.0 (0.5–3.0) 0 (0.0–3.0) 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) <0.001
 C3, median (range) 0.75 (0.0–2.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.5–2.0) 0.5 (0.0–2.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.0 (0.0–2.0) 0.06
 C4d, peritubular capillary, n (%) 0.69
 positive 5 (18) 1 (33) 0 (0) 1 (33) 2 (33) 1 (17)
 Negative 22 (79) 2 (67) 9 (90) 2 (67) 4 (67) 5 (83)
 Not done 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 C4d, glomerular, n (%) 0.25
 Mesangial 7 (25) 0 (0) 5 (50) 1 (10) 0 (0) 1 (17)
 Capillary wall 12 (43) 1 (33) 2 (20) 2 (20) 5 (83) 2 (33)
 Negative 7 (25) 2 (67) 2 (20) 0 (0) 1 (17) 2 (33)
 Not done 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (10) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Electron microscopy
 Electron microscopy performed, n (%) 21 (75) 3 (100) 8 (80) 1 (33) 4 (67) 5 (83) 0.36
 Deposit location, n (%) 0.34
 Mesangial 14 (67) 2 (67) 6 (75) 0 (0) 2 (50) 3 (60)
 Mesangial and subendothelial 5 (24) 1 (33) 2 (25) 1 (100) 1 (25) 0 (0)
 None 3 (14) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (25) 2 (40)
 Feature of transplant glomerulopathy (glomerular basement membrane duplication or mesangiolysis) 6 (29) 1 (33) 2 (25) 0 (0) 2 (50) 1 (20) 0.75
 Percent podocyte effacement, median (range) 10 (0–100) 5 (5–10) 10 (0–80) 30 (30–30) 10 (0–10) 10 (0–100) 0.73
a

Some biopsies demonstrated more than 1 glomerular injury pattern.