Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;34(3):273–293. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00412-3

Table 1.

Comparison of different in vivo antibody gene delivery platforms

Synthetic DNA mRNA Viral vector
Starting material Plasmid DNA Plasmid DNA Plasmid DNA
Injected material Plasmid DNA/by EP mRNA in LNP AAV, Ad vector
In vivo product mAb, BsMAb mAb, BsMAb mAb, BsMAb
Transient Yes Yes Yes; however, rare cases may integrate (AAV)
Cell compartment Nucleus Cytoplasm Nucleus
Integration None observed in humans Low probability data early Possible [14]
Anti-vector immunity No No Yes, serotype specific
Duration of a single administration Weeks/months Days/weeks Months/years
Delivery route ID, IM IV, IM/ID IM, IN, IV, IC, IO, IT
Tissue specificity/tropism Local site of administration Non-specific Serotype dependent
Vector take High in animals High in preclinical Variable
Human safety Very safe, no SAEs in 1000s of individuals Ongoing trials, SAEs reported [15] Safe but potential for integration (AAV)
Ease of manufacturing Yes Likely yes with caveats Moderate
Cold-chain free Yes

Possible (with LNP)

No (without LNP)

No

AAV adenovirus-associated virus, Ad adenovirus, BsMAb bispecific mAb, EP electroporation, IC intracranial, ID intradermal, IM intramuscular, IN intranasal, IO intraocular (subretinal and intravitreal), IT intrathecal, IV intravenous, LNP lipid nanoparticle, mAb monoclonal antibody, mRNA messenger RNA, SAEs serious adverse events