Palomaki 1999.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: parallel design Number of arms: 2 Experimental arm: mianserin (tetracyclic agent) Control arm: matched placebo |
|
Participants | Geographical location: Finland
Setting: unclear Stroke criteria: ischaemic stroke Method of stroke diagnosis: via clinical signs and CT or MRI (100%) Time since stroke: 0 to 30 days prior to randomisation (average 14.3 days) Inclusion criteria: 1) under 71 years of age Exclusion criteria: 1) other diseases severe enough to confound the assessments of stroke outcome (severe cardiovascular, renal or liver disease, psychosis, alcoholism or dementia); 2) currently on antidepressants Total number randomised in this study: 100 Number randomised to treatment group: 51 (71% men, mean age 56 years, SD 11) Number randomised to control group: 49 (65% men, mean age 55 years, SD 10) Total number included in final analysis: 64 Number included in treatment group for final analysis: 27 Number included in control group for final analysis: 37 |
|
Interventions | Treatment: mianserin (tetracyclic agent),10 mg every night; within 10 days dosage increased to 60 mg daily
Control: matched placebo
Treatment duration: treatment continued for 12 months Follow‐up: 18 months |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk |
Quote: "The patients were randomized to mianserin or placebo groups of equal size, stratified according to location of lesion ..." pp. 490 Comments: method of sequence generation not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk |
Quote: "The randomization codes were kept in sealed envelopes." pp. 491 Comments: this method of concealment can be tampered with |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "For each stratum, the test drugs were provided in numbered vials containing tablets of identical appearance." pp. 491 |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comments: blinding of outcome assessment not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comments: per protocol analysis reported only. Only 75% of participants remained in placebo and 52% remained in treatment group at 12 months and were included in the analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comments: no trial protocol available to compare with the publication |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Comments: the treatment group had more heart disease |