Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;2020(5):CD003689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003689.pub4

Palomaki 1999.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: parallel design
Number of arms: 2
Experimental arm: mianserin (tetracyclic agent)
Control arm: matched placebo
Participants Geographical location: Finland
Setting: unclear
Stroke criteria: ischaemic stroke
Method of stroke diagnosis: via clinical signs and CT or MRI (100%)
Time since stroke: 0 to 30 days prior to randomisation (average 14.3 days)
Inclusion criteria: 1) under 71 years of age
Exclusion criteria: 1) other diseases severe enough to confound the assessments of stroke outcome (severe cardiovascular, renal or liver disease, psychosis, alcoholism or dementia); 2) currently on antidepressants
Total number randomised in this study: 100
Number randomised to treatment group: 51 (71% men, mean age 56 years, SD 11)
Number randomised to control group: 49 (65% men, mean age 55 years, SD 10)
Total number included in final analysis: 64
Number included in treatment group for final analysis: 27
Number included in control group for final analysis: 37
Interventions Treatment: mianserin (tetracyclic agent),10 mg every night; within 10 days dosage increased to 60 mg daily
Control: matched placebo
Treatment duration: treatment continued for 12 months
Follow‐up: 18 months
Outcomes Primary outcomes
  • Depression (proportion not meeting criteria for major depression) measured using the DSM‐III‐R

  • Depression (change in scores from baseline to end of treatment) measured using the HDRS and the BDI


Secondary outcomes
  • Adverse events

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "The patients were randomized to mianserin or placebo groups of equal size, stratified according to location of lesion ..." pp. 490
Comments: method of sequence generation not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Quote: "The randomization codes were kept in sealed envelopes." pp. 491
Comments: this method of concealment can be tampered with
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: "For each stratum, the test drugs were provided in numbered vials containing tablets of identical appearance." pp. 491
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comments: blinding of outcome assessment not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Comments: per protocol analysis reported only. Only 75% of participants remained in placebo and 52% remained in treatment group at 12 months and were included in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comments: no trial protocol available to compare with the publication
Other bias Unclear risk Comments: the treatment group had more heart disease