Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;2020(5):CD003689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003689.pub4

Rasmussen 2003.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: parallel design
Number of arms: 2
Experimental arm: sertraline (SSRI)
Control arm: matched placebo
Participants Geographical location: Denmark
Setting: unclear
Stroke criteria: ischaemic and primary intracerebral haemorrhage
Method of stroke diagnosis: via clinical signs and symptoms
Time since stroke: 0 to 4 weeks prior to randomisation
Inclusion criteria: not reported
Exclusion criteria: 1) current depression; 2) significant aphasia or dementia; 3) history of schizophrenia; 4) psychosis or severe drug abuse; 5) pre‐existing neurological illness; 6) antidepressants in preceding 4 weeks; 7) current (within 6 months) cardiovascular illness
Total number randomised in this study: 137
Number randomised to treatment group: 70 (50% men, mean age 72 years, SD 9)
Number randomised to control group: 67 (51% men, mean age 68 years, SD 11)
Total number included in final analysis: 118
Number included in treatment group for final analysis: 61
Number included in control group for final analysis: 57
Interventions Treatment: sertraline (SSRI), 50 mg daily; at any time after 2 weeks dose could be increased in 50 mg increments up to 150 mg daily; average dose 62.9 mg daily
Control: matched placebo
Treatment duration: treatment continued for 12 months
Follow‐up: not reported
Outcomes Primary outcomes
  • Depression (change in scores from baseline to end of treatment) measured using the HDRS

  • Depression (proportion scoring > 2) measured using the CGI

  • Depression (proportion scoring > 16) measured using the GDS


Secondary outcomes
  • Leaving the study early

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Patients were randomly assigned to 12 months of double‐blind study treatment." pp. 217
Comments: method of sequence generation not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comments: method of allocation concealment not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: title ‐ "A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of sertraline in the prevention of depression in stroke patients." pp. 216
Comments: who was blinded was not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: title ‐ "A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of sertraline in the prevention of depression in stroke patients." pp. 216
Comments: who was blinded was not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Comments: per protocol analysis reported only. 19/137 were not included in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comments: no trial protocol available to compare with the publication
Other bias Unclear risk Comments: the treatment group were older on average