Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;8(9):1608–1619. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i9.1608

Table 5.

Analysis of lymph node metastasis using the chi-squared test and a logistic regression model

Characteristic Lymph node metastasis
Univariate
Multivariate
Yes No P value OR 95%CI P value
Sex
Male 766 (71) 618 (66.7) 0.040 1.000
Female 313 (29) 308 (33.3) 0.840 0.682-1.034 0.099
Age
≤ 60 yr 573 (53.1) 496 (53.6) 0.837 1.000
> 60 yr 506 (46.9) 430 (46.4) 1.035 0.854-1.255 0.726
Tumour size
≤ 5 cm 580 (53.8) 316 (34.1) 0.001 1.000
> 5 cm 499 (46.2) 610 (65.9) 0.552 0.453-0.674 0.001
Lymphovascular invasion
Yes 415 (38.5) 608 (65.7) 0.001 0.356 0.294-0.431 0.001
No 664 (61.5) 318 (34.3) 1.000
Depth of invasion
Muscularis propria 252 (23.4) 252 (27.2) 0.647 0.297-1.409 0.273
Sub-serosal 453 (42) 412 (44.5) 0.711 0.329-1.537 0.386
Serosal exposed 327 (30.3) 233 (25.2) 0.908 0.418-1.975 0.808
Serosal invasion 30 (2.8) 18 (1.9) 1.078 0.414-2.809 0.877
Histology
Tubular adenocarcinoma (well) 46 (4.3) 16 (1.8) 0.011 1.000
Tubular adenocarcinoma (moderate) 342 (32.3) 282 (31) 0.560 0.301-1.043 0.068
Tubular adenocarcinoma (poorly) 519 (49) 473 (52) 0.583 0.315-1.080 0.086
Signet ring cell carcinoma 119 (11.2) 100 (11) 0.676 0.347-1.318 0.251
Mucinous adenocarcinoma 33 (3.1) 38 (4.2) 0.474 0.218-1.029 0.059

OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.