Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;33(7):895–899. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.05.005

Table 2.

Efficacy of handheld ultrasound in patients with COVID-19 compared with standard echocardiography

Handheld echocardiography (n = 90) Standard echocardiography (n = 90) 95% CI or χ2 P
Age, y 67 ± 14 63 ± 15 .15
Sex, male 64 64 0
BMI, kg/m2 32 ± 10
Adequate for indication 98 99
Study time, min 5.4 ± 1.9 24 ± 6.8 −35 to −38 <.00001
WM interpreted 85 78 2.1 .34
MR interpreted 93 100 .012
PE interpreted 100 98 1.00
FU studies required (inadequately imaged) 0 0
FU studies ordered for reevaluation 13 20 .77

BMI, Body mass indexed; FU, follow-up; MR, mitral regurgitation; PE, pericardial effusion; WM, wall motion.

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as percentages.

Fisher exact test.