Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;12(4):1529–1539. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.43

Table 3. Comparison of outcomes of myasthenia gravis after extended thymectomy.

The postintervention status Overall (n=109) Subxiphoid approach (n=58) Right-sided approach (n=51)
n % n % n %
CSR 42 38.5 23 39.7 19 37.3
PR 14 12.8 8 13.8 6 11.8
MM 40 36.7 21 36.2 19 37.3
I 2 18.3 1 1.7 1 1.9
U 5 4.6 2 3.4 3 5.9
W 3 2.8 2 3.4 1 1.9
E 3 2.8 1 1.7 2 3.9
Effective treatment of MG (n)a 98 89.9 53 91.4 45 88.2
Ineffective treatment of MG (n)b 11 10.1 5 8.6 6 11.8
Overall 109 100 58 53.2 51 46.8
   Z −0.486
   P 0.627

Effects according to the American MGFA (19): CSR, complete stable remission; PR, pharmacological remission; MM, minimal manifestation; I, improved; U, unchanged; W, worse; E, exacerbation; MG, myasthenia gravis. a, CSR + PR + MM + I; b, U + W + E + D.