Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;22:32. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00609-z

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

All patients (n = 208) Primary prevention (n = 115) Secondary prevention (n = 93) p–value
Age, years 60 ± 12 60 ± 11 59 ± 13 0.532
Gender, male, n(%) 174 (84) 98 (85) 76 (82) 0.498
BMI, kg/m2 28.6 ± 5.1 29.2 ± 5.3 27.9 ± 4.8 0.062
Hypertension, n(%) 144 (69) 80 (70) 64 (69) 0.907
Diabetes, n(%) 46 (22) 32 (28) 14 (15) 0.027
CHA2DS2–VASc Score 2.7 ± 1.4 2.8 ± 1.2 2.4 ± 1.5 0.006
NYHA class 1.9 ± 0.9 2.1 ± 0.9 1.6 ± 1.0 0.001
Known CAD, n(%) 83 (40) 52 (45) 31 (33) 0.082
Severity of CAD 0.178
 Single–vessel, n(%) 31 (37) 18 (35) 13 (42)
 Multi–vessel, n(%) 52 (63) 34 (65) 18 (58)
Electrical instability 0.009
  ≤ 2 adequate ATP/shock(s), n(%) 23 (11) 16 (14) 7 (8)
 Electrical storm, n(%) 107 (51) 53 (46) 54 (58)
 Below detection, n(%) 11 (5) 3 (3) 8 (9)
 Inadequate ATP/shock(s), n(%) 15 (7) 6 (5) 9 (10)
Prior VT ablation, n(%) 50 (24) 16 (14) 34 (37) < 0.001
Antiarrhythmic drugs
 Betablockers, n(%) 189 (91) 104 (90) 85 (91) 0.811
 Class I, n(%) 14 (7) 5 (4) 9 (10) 0.127
 Class III, n(%) 60 (29) 31 (27) 29 (31) 0.504
Device characteristics 0.070
 S–ICD, n(%) 6 (3) 5 (4) 1 (1)
 Single chamber ICD, n(%) 101 (49) 55 (48) 46 (49)
 Dual chamber ICD, n(%) 65 (31) 30 (26) 35 (38)
 CRT–D, n(%) 36 (17) 25 (22) 11 (12)
MR-conditional devices, n(%) 94 (45) 48 (42) 46 (49) 0.266
 Time since ICD implantation, months 58.9 ± 50.0 56.4 ± 42.4 61.9 ± 58.2 0.436
 Range, months 1.4–240.4 1.6–225.0 1.4–240.4

Values are mean ± SD or n (%); p-values are given for the comparison of primary versus secondary prevention. BMI body mass index; CAD coronary artery disease; ATP antitachycardia pacing; VT ventricular tachycardia; ICD implanted cardioverter defibrillator; S–ICD subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator; CRT–D cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, MR magnetic resonance