Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;22:32. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00609-z

Table 4.

CMR-Based Change in Treatment

Post-CMR Treatment All patients (n = 208) All patients Change in treatment Primary prevention (n = 115) Primary prevention Change in treatment Secondary prevention (n = 93) Secondary prevention Change in treatment
Coronary Revasc 10 10 (5) 5 5 (4) 5 5 (5)
CRT upgrade 3 3 (1) 2 2 (2) 1 1 (1)
LVAD 2 1 (0.5) 2 1 (1) 0 0 (0)
Medical therapy 56 27 (13) 32 15 (13) 24 12 (13)
PVI 13 1 (0.5) 8 1 (1) 5 0 (0)
PV angioplasty 1 1 (0.5) 1 1 (1) 0 0 (0)
VT ablation 123 0 (0) 65 0 (0) 58 0 (0)
Total 208 43 (21) 115 25 (22) 93 18 (19)*

Values are n (%) for all, primary and secondary prevention groups. Coronary Revasc, coronary revascularization procedure; CRT cardiac resynchronization therapy LVAD left ventricular assist device; PVI pulmonary venous isolation procedure; PV pulmonary vein; VT ventricular tachycardia. * p = 0.673 for the comparison of primary versus secondary prevention