Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 14;54(9):528–537. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101228

Table 6.

Rectus femoris/quadriceps injury diagnosis: effectiveness of clinical tests and grading the quality of evidence

Clinical tests Likelihood ratio
(95% CI)
Diagnostic effectiveness
High Moderate Low/very low
MRI used as reference standard
 Rectus femoris palpation71 LR+=11.20 (4.85 to 25.86) Low quality of evidence
LR−=0 Moderate quality of evidence
 Resisted hip flexion at 0°71 LR+=1.45 (0.90 to 2.32) Moderate quality of evidence
LR−=0.55 (0.15 to 1.79) Low quality of evidence
 Resisted hip flexion at 90°71 LR+=2.47 (1.41 to 4.34) Moderate quality of evidence
LR−=0.36 (0.11 to 1.21) Low quality of evidence
 Resisted hip flexion (modified Thomas test position)71 LR+=2.36 (1.53 to 3.66) Moderate quality of evidence
LR−=0.20 (0.03 to 1.27) Low quality of evidence
 Resisted knee extension (modified Thomas test position)71 LR+=4.17 (2.54 to 6.82) Moderate quality of evidence
LR−=0 Moderate quality of evidence
 Passive hip extension (modified Thomas test position)71 LR+=2.70 (1.50 to 4.86) Moderate quality of evidence
LR−=0.35 (0.10 to 1.17) Low quality of evidence
 Passive knee flexion (modified Thomas test position)71 LR+=5.47 (2.75 to 10.87) Low quality of evidence
LR−=0.15 (0.02 to 0.94) Low quality of evidence

MRI; the diagnostic effectiveness of the positive (LR+) and negative (LR−) likelihood ratios are classified individually as: very low (LR+: 1 to 2; LR−: 0.5 to 1), low (LR+: >2 to 5; LR−: 0.2 to <0.5), moderate (LR+: >5 to 10; LR−: 0.1 to <0.2); high (LR+: >10; LR−: <0.1).37