Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 May 11;159(1):320–334.e27. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.001

AGA Institute Rapid Review of the Gastrointestinal and Liver Manifestations of COVID-19, Meta-Analysis of International Data, and Recommendations for the Consultative Management of Patients with COVID-19

Shahnaz Sultan 1,, Osama Altayar 2,, Shazia M Siddique 3, Perica Davitkov 4, Joseph D Feuerstein 5, Joseph K Lim 6, Yngve Falck-Ytter 4, Hashem B El-Serag 7; AGA Institute, on behalf of the
PMCID: PMC7212965  PMID: 32407808

Abstract

Background & Aims

Multiple gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, including diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain, as well as liver enzyme abnormalities, have been variably reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This document provides best practice statements and recommendations for consultative management based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of international data on GI and liver manifestations of COVID-19.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search to identify published and unpublished studies using OVID Medline and preprint servers (medRxiv, LitCovid, and SSRN) up until April 5, 2020; major journal sites were monitored for US publications until April 19, 2020. We pooled the prevalence of diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, as well as liver function tests abnormalities, using a fixed-effect model and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework.

Results

We identified 118 studies and used a hierarchal study selection process to identify unique cohorts. We performed a meta-analysis of 47 studies including 10,890 unique patients. Pooled prevalence estimates of GI symptoms were as follows: diarrhea 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2%–8.2%), nausea/vomiting 7.8% (95% CI, 7.1%–8.5%), and abdominal pain 2.7% (95% CI, 2.0%–3.4%). Most studies reported on hospitalized patients. The pooled prevalence estimates of elevated liver abnormalities were as follows: aspartate transaminase 15.0% (95% CI, 13.6%–16.5%) and alanine transaminase 15.0% (95% CI, 13.6%–16.4%). When we compared studies from China to studies from other countries in subgroup analyses, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and liver abnormalities were more prevalent outside of China, with diarrhea reported in 18.3% (95% CI, 16.6%–20.1%). Isolated GI symptoms were reported rarely. We also summarized the Gl and liver adverse effects of the most commonly utilized medications for COVID-19.

Conclusions

GI symptoms are associated with COVID-19 in <10% of patients. In studies outside of China, estimates are higher. Further studies are needed with standardized GI symptoms questionnaires and liver function test checks on admission to better quantify and qualify the association of these symptoms with COVID-19. Based on findings from our meta-analysis, we provide several Best Practice Statements for the consultative management of COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19, Gastrointestinal and Liver Manifestations

Abbreviations used in this paper: AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; GI, gastrointestinal; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; LFT, liver function test; MERS, Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus; ULN, upper limit of normal


The coronavirus family has 4 common human coronaviruses (ie, 229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1) associated with the common cold, and 3 strains that are associated with pneumonia, respiratory failure, and death, including SARS-CoV (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus), MERS-CoV (Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus), and SARS-CoV-2.1 The novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was first described in December 2019 in patients in Wuhan, China who developed severe pneumonia, and was named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the World Health Organization on February 11, 2020.2 COVID-19 is estimated to have resulted in 2,896,633 cases in 185 countries with 202,832 deaths as of April 25, 2020.3 COVID-19 was first reported in the United States on January 20, 2020 and accounted for a total number of 938,154 cases and 53,755 deaths as of April 25, 2020. In the United States, an early analysis of the first 4226 cases from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as of March 16, 2020 revealed estimated rates of hospitalization of 20.7%–31.4%; intensive care unit admission of 4.9%–11.5%; and case fatality of 1.8%–3.4%.4 More recent data from a cohort of 5700 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 within a large health care system in New York City revealed common comorbidities, including hypertension (56.6%), obesity (41.7%), and diabetes (33.8%), and reported that 373 patients (14.2%) required treatment in the intensive care unit, and 320 patients (12.2%) received invasive mechanical ventilation, in whom the mortality rate was 88.1% (282 of 320)].5

Angiotensin converting enzyme II, believed to be the target entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2, is abundantly expressed in gastric, duodenal, and rectal epithelia, thereby implicating angiotensin converting enzyme II as a vehicle for possible fecal–oral transmission.6 In addition, angiotensin converting enzyme II receptors can be expressed in hepatic cholangiocytes7 and hepatocytes,8 potentially permitting direct infection of hepatic cells.

Nongastrointestinal symptoms for COVID-19 include fever, cough, shortness of breath, chills, repeated shaking with chills, muscle pain, headache, sore throat, and new loss of taste or smell. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, including anorexia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and/or diarrhea have been reported in patients with COVID-19. Additionally, abnormal liver enzymes are also observed.9 However, significant heterogeneity has been observed in the reporting of GI and liver symptoms across settings.10 The most commonly reported GI symptom in COVID-19 is diarrhea, which has been reported in 1%–36% of patients.10 An updated characterization of the GI and liver manifestations across global settings is needed to further inform clinical guidance in the management of patients with COVID-19.

Scope and Purpose

We seek to summarize international data on the Gl and liver manifestations of COVID-19 infection and treatment. Additionally, this document provides evidence-based clinical guidance on clinical questions that gastroenterologists may be consulted for. This rapid review document was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Guidelines Committee, AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee, and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely, methodologically rigorous guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA members and the public. Table 1 provides a summary of the recommendations and best practice statements.

Table 1.

Summary of Best Practice Statements: Consultative Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019

Statement no. Statement
1 In outpatients with new-onset diarrhea, ascertain information about high-risk contact exposure; obtain a detailed history of symptoms associated with COVID-19, including fever, cough, shortness of breath, chills, muscle pain, headache, sore throat, or new loss of taste or smell; and obtain a thorough history for other Gl symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain.
2 In outpatients with new-onset Gl symptoms (eg, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea), monitor for symptoms associated with COVID-19, as GI symptoms may precede COVID-related symptoms by a few days. In a high COVID-19 prevalence setting, COVID-19 testing should be considered.
3 In hospitalized patients with suspected or known COVID-19, obtain a thorough history of GI symptoms (ie, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea), including onset, characteristics, duration, and severity.
4 There is presently inadequate evidence to support stool testing for diagnosis or monitoring of COVID-19 as part of routine clinical practice.
5 In patients (outpatients or inpatients) with elevated LFTs in context of suspected or known COVID-19, evaluate for alternative etiologies.
6 In hospitalized patients with suspected or known COVID-19, obtain baseline LFTs at the time of admission and consider LFT monitoring throughout the hospitalization, particularly in the context of drug treatment for COVID-19
7 In hospitalized patients undergoing drug treatment for COVID-19, evaluate for treatment-related Gl and hepatic adverse effects.

Panel Composition and Conflict of Interest Management

This rapid review and guideline was developed by gastroenterologists and guideline methodologists from the 2 AGA committees. The guideline panel worked collaboratively with the AGA Governing Board to develop the clinical questions, review the evidence profiles, and develop the recommendations. Panel members disclosed all potential conflicts of interest according to AGA Institute policy.

Target Audience

The target audience of this guideline includes gastroenterologists, advanced practice providers, nurses, and other health care professionals. Patients as well as policy-makers can benefit from these guidelines. These guidelines are not intended to impose a standard of care for individual institutions, health care systems, or countries. They provide the basis for rational informed decisions for clinicians, patients, and other health care professionals in the setting of a pandemic.

Methods

Information Sources and Literature Search

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify all published and unpublished studies that could be considered eligible for our review, with no restrictions on languages. In the setting of a pandemic with exponential increases in published and unpublished studies, our search strategy was multifaceted. To capture relevant published articles, we electronically searched OVID Medline from inception to March 23, 2020 using the Medical Subject Heading term developed for COVID-19. We then searched the following platforms on April 5, 2020 for additional published and unpublished studies: medRxiv, LitCovid,11 and SSRN. An additional unpublished article under peer review was obtained through personal communication. For studies from the United States, we continued to monitor major journals for additional publications until April 19, 2020.

Study Selection and Data Extraction

Independent screening of titles and abstracts was performed by independent reviewers (P.D., S.S., J.F.) to identify potential studies for inclusion. A second reviewer (O.A.) subsequently reviewed the full-text articles and identified articles for inclusion. Any disagreements about inclusion were resolved through discussion. We incorporated any studies (prospective or retrospective) that reported on patient characteristics and symptoms of interest. For studies published in Chinese, we used Google translate to assess for potential inclusion and for data extraction.

Due to concerns about inclusion of the same patients in different publications, we used a hierarchical model of data extraction to minimize double counting of patients across similar institutions with coinciding dates of study inclusion. We aimed to identify and include data from the largest possible cohort from each location or hospital.12 Data extraction was performed using a 2-step process. The initial data extraction focused on data elements for study and patient characteristics. Subsequently, we identified studies for full data extraction based on study location (unique hospitals) and total number of patients. Additionally, when a study from a specific hospital did not provide all of the necessary information for the diarrhea symptoms, the next largest study from the same hospital (when available) was selected for inclusion in our analysis.

Data extraction was performed using a standardized Microsoft Excel data extraction form. Data extraction was performed in pairs; one study author independently extracted data while a second reviewer checked for accuracy of the data extraction (S.S., O.A., S.M.S., P.D., J.D.F., J.K.L., Y.F.Y., H.B.E.). Because the reporting of the data in the primary studies was suboptimal, a third reviewer (O.A.) additionally verified the extracted data to confirm the numbers and to resolve any disagreements. Studies with discrepancies in the data were excluded.

The following data elements were extracted:

  • 1.

    Study: author, year, location (hospital name, city, province or state), dates of inclusion, and date of last follow-up

  • 2.

    Patient characteristics: number of patients, age (mean, median, interquartile interval or range), number of females, severity of illness, inclusion criteria (hospitalized or outpatients), GI comorbidities (pre-existing conditions, such as chronic liver disease, hepatitis, and inflammatory bowel disease)

  • 3.

    Outcomes: diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and liver function test (LFT) abnormalities

  • 4.

    Additional information: severity, characteristics, duration, timing (before or concurrent with respiratory symptoms), relationship with clinical outcomes (need for ventilator, survival, discharge, and continued hospitalization), and viral stool shedding.

Assessment of Risk of Bias

We assessed the risk of bias according to the following domains as suggested in the ROBINS-I tool for nonrandomized studies.13

  • 1.

    Bias due to selection of participants in the study

  • 2.

    Bias due to missing data

  • 3.

    Bias in the measurement of outcomes

  • 4.

    Bias in the selection of the reported result

We considered the domains for each study and then made a judgment of high or low risk of bias for the studies included in the meta-analysis.

Certainty of Evidence

Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. The certainty of evidence was categorized into 4 levels ranging from very low to high. Within the GRADE framework, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) starts as high-certainty evidence and observational studies start out as low-certainty evidence, but can be rated down for the following reasons: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. Additionally, evidence from well-conducted observational studies start as low-certainty evidence, but can be rated up for large effects or dose–response.14

Data Synthesis and Analysis

A meta-analysis of prevalence of GI and liver abnormalities was performed using meta 4.11-0 package in R software, version 3.6.3.15 , 16 The prevalence was expressed as a proportion and 95% confidence interval (CI). We used the fixed-effects model using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method for proportions. This is the preferred method of transformation and avoids giving an undue larger weight to studies with very large or very small prevalence.17 , 18 The I 2 statistic was used to measure heterogeneity.19 To explore heterogeneity, we performed subgroup analyses based on the location (region) of the study and clinical settings (inpatient vs outpatient). To assess the robustness of our results, we performed sensitivity analyses by limiting the included studies to those that clearly reported the presence of symptoms at initial presentation.

Results

A total of 57 studies were ultimately selected for complete data extraction; 56 from our search and 1 additional manuscript (under review) was included to provide more data on a US cohort20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 (see Supplementary Figure 1 for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram). Of the 57 selected studies, 47 reported on unique patients based on hospital name (with no duplication of cohorts from the same hospital). An additional 10 studies were identified with potentially overlapping cohorts based on hospital name, but these were included if they provided unique information about a specific symptom (eg, diarrhea at initial presentation when the larger cohort did not clearly state that it was at initial presentation). Based on our comprehensive selection process, we believe that the included 47 studies reported data on 10,890 unique COVID-19 patients. The majority of studies (70%) in our analysis were from China; these were selected from 118 reports published or prepublished from China (Supplementary Figure 2). The studies included mainly adults, although a few studies included a small proportion of pediatric patients. Two studies reported on outpatients only, whereas the remaining 55 studies reported on hospitalized patients or a combination of outpatients and hospitalized patients. Based on our inclusion strategy: 55 studies (96%) provided information on any GI symptom and 32 studies (56%) reported any data on liver abnormalities. Fewer studies, 21 (37%), provided information on underlying GI conditions. Table 2 provides a summary of the pooled prevalence estimates.

Supplement Figure 1.

Supplement Figure 1

PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram

Supplementary Figure 2.

Supplementary Figure 2

The matrix used in the selection of the Chinese studies. The X-axis represents the studies. The Y axis represent the hospitals included in the study. The size of the bubble reflects the number of patients in the study. Two studies by Guan et al101,102 were not included in the plot as they included patients from more than 500 hospitals from 30 or more provinces without providing the names of the hospitals.

Table 2.

Summary of the Pooled Prevalence Estimates of Gastrointestinal/Liver Manifestations

GI and liver manifestations All studies
Studies from China
Studies from countries other than China
% (95% CI) Patients/ studies, n % (95% CI) Patients/ studies, n % (95% CI) Patients/ studies, n
Diarrhea in all patientsa 7.7 (7.2 to 8.2) 43/10,676 5.8 (5.3 to 6.4) 32/8612 18.3 (16.6 to 20.1) 11/2064
Nausea/vomiting in all patientsa 7.8 (7.1 to 8.5) 26/5955 5.2 (4.4 to 5.9) 19/4054 14.9 (13.3 to –16.6) 7/1901
Abdominal pain in all patientsa 3.6 (3.0 to 4.3) 15/4031 2.7 (2.0 to 3.4) 10/2447 5.3 (4.2 to 6.6) 5/1584
Patients with elevated AST 15.0 (13.6 to 16.5) 16/2514 14.9 (13.5 to 16.4) 14/2398 20.0 (12.8 to 28.1) 2/116
Patients with elevated ALT 15.0 (13.6 to 16.4) 17/2711 14.9 (13.5 to 16.3) 15/2595 19.0 (12.0 to 27.1) 2/116
Patients with elevated total bilirubin 16.7 (15.0 to 18.5) 10/1841 16.7 (15.0 to 18.5) 10/1841
a

Regardless of hospitalization and timing of symptoms.

Overall Certainty of Evidence

The overall certainty in the body of evidence was low. Our confidence in the pooled estimates of prevalence was reduced because of concerns of risk of bias (ie, selection bias, detection bias, and attrition bias), heterogeneity of the tested patient populations (inconsistency), as well as issues of indirectness (the majority of studies included primarily symptomatic hospitalized patients instead of all patients with COVID-19). Additionally, most of the studies were retrospective cohort series and did not specify whether consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Other limitations included inconsistent assessment of symptoms and/or laboratory tests, missing data and/or inconsistent reporting of data, and insufficient follow-up of the patients. These factors may have contributed to the heterogeneity of findings across studies. The I 2 statistic ranged from 77% to 98% and was not completely explained by geographic location or by outpatient vs inpatient status.

What are the Gastrointestinal Manifestations of COVID-19?

Diarrhea

A total of 43 studies including 10,676 COVID-19 patients (confirmed by laboratory real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] testing) were included in the overall analysis.20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 , 37 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 45 , 47 , 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 , 58 , 59 , 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 , 73 , 76 The pooled prevalence of diarrhea symptoms across these studies was 7.7% (95% CI, 7.2%–8.2%). When analyzing by country (studies from China vs studies from other countries), the pooled prevalence of diarrhea in studies from countries other than China was much higher at 18.3% (95% CI, 16.6%–20.1%). This is in comparison to studies from China, where the prevalence was much lower at 5.8% (95% CI, 5.3%–6.4%) (Figure 1 ).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Forest plot of the prevalence of diarrhea in all patients.

In hospitalized patients, across 39 studies including 8,521 patients, the pooled prevalence was slightly higher at 10.4% (95% CI, 9.4%–10.7%) compared with outpatients.20, 21, 22, 23 , 25, 26, 27, 28 , 30 , 33, 34, 35 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 44, 45, 46 , 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 , 60 , 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 , 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 , 76 In 3 studies including 1701 outpatients, the pooled prevalence was 4.0% (95% CI, 3.1%–5.1%).31 , 59 , 63 As part of the sensitivity analysis, we identified 35 studies including 9717 patients that described diarrhea, and explicitly reported that it was one of the initial presenting symptoms.20, 21, 22, 23 , 26, 27, 28 , 31 , 33, 34, 35 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 , 60 , 63, 64, 65, 66 , 68, 69, 70, 71 , 74 , 76 The pooled prevalence in these studies was 7.9% (95% CI, 7.4%–8.6%). A total of 33 studies including 8070 patients reported on hospitalized COVID-19 patients presenting with diarrhea as one of the initial symptoms of COVID-19.20, 21, 22, 23 , 26, 27, 28 , 33, 34, 35 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 48 , 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 , 60 , 63, 64, 65, 66 , 68 , 70, 71, 72, 73 , 76 The pooled prevalence was 9.3% (95% CI, 8.6%–9.9%) (Supplementary Figure 3, Supplementary Figure 4, Supplementary Figure 5, Supplementary Figure 6).

Supplementary Figure 3.

Supplementary Figure 3

Forest plot of the prevalence of diarrhea in all admitted patients regardless of the timing of diarrhea.

Supplementary Figure 4.

Supplementary Figure 4

Forest plot of the prevalence of diarrhea as one of the initial symptoms in all patients regardless of hospitalization status.

Supplementary Figure 5.

Supplementary Figure 5

Forest plot of the prevalence of diarrhea as one of the initial symptoms in all admitted patients.

Supplementary Figure 6.

Supplementary Figure 6

Forest plot of the prevalence of diarrhea in outpatients regardless of the timing of diarrhea.

Description of diarrhea

Only a handful of studies provided any details on the type and severity of diarrhea symptoms.55 , 60 , 74 In the study by Lin et al,55 23 of 95 patients (24%) reported having diarrhea (described as loose or watery stools, ranging from 2–10 bowel movements per day); however, only a small number of patients actually had diarrhea on admission (5.2%). Most patients developed diarrhea during the hospitalization, which may have been attributable to other treatments or medications. In the study by Jin et al60 of 651 hospitalized patients, 8.6% of patients had diarrhea on admission before receiving any treatments. The diarrhea symptoms were described as more than 3 loose stools per day. Stool cultures were negative (including Clostridium difficile) in all patients. There was no mention of fecal leukocytes. Median duration of symptoms was 4 days (range, 1–9 days) and most patients had self-limited diarrheal symptoms.60 One additional study on 175 hospitalized patients reported that 19.4% of patients had diarrhea, with an average of 6 episodes per day, with symptom duration ranging from 1 to 4 days.74

Diarrhea as the only presenting symptom in the absence of upper respiratory symptoms

In the 43 studies that informed our analysis on the prevalence of diarrhea, we extracted information on whether diarrhea was reported as the only presenting symptom.50 , 60 In only 2 studies, there was explicit reporting of diarrhea in the absence of upper respiratory infection symptoms. In a study by Luo et al50 of 1141 patients, 183 patients (16%) presented with GI symptoms only in the absence of respiratory symptoms. Of 1141 patients, loss of appetite (15.8%) and nausea or vomiting (11.7%) were the most common symptoms, but diarrhea was reported in 6.0% and abdominal pain in 3.9% of patients. Notably, the majority of patients (96%) had lung infiltrates on chest computed tomography. In the study by Jin et al60 of 651 hospitalized patients, 21 patients (3.2%) presented with GI symptoms only (and no respiratory symptoms of coughing or sputum production).60 GI symptoms were defined as at least 1 of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Conversely, in the US study of 116 patients with COVID-19, Cholankeril et al70 reported that 31.9% of patients had GI symptoms on admission (median duration, 1 day); diarrhea was reported in 10.3% (12 of 116), nausea and/or vomiting in 10.3% (12 of 116), and abdominal pain in 8.8% (10 of 116). The authors explicitly reported that none of the 116 patients had isolated GI symptoms as the only manifestation of COVID-19.

Diarrhea as the initial presenting symptom preceding other COVID-19 symptoms

Of the studies included in our review, based on our selection framework, we identified only 1 study that reported on timing of diarrhea in relation to other COVID-19–related symptoms. In a study by Ai et al76 of 102 hospitalized patients, 15 patients reported diarrhea symptoms on hospital admission, and diarrhea was the first symptom in 2 patients. In a study by Wang et al77 of 138 consecutive hospitalized patients, not included in our pooled analysis, a total of 14 patients presented with diarrhea and nausea 1–2 days before the development of fever and dyspnea.

Nausea/vomiting

A total of 26 studies including 5955 patients with COVID-19 (confirmed by laboratory RT-PCR testing), were included in the overall analysis for nausea and/or vomiting.20 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 34 , 37 , 41 , 45, 46, 47 , 50 , 51 , 54 , 55 , 59 , 63 , 65 , 67 , 68 , 70, 71, 72, 73 , 76 The pooled prevalence of nausea/vomiting was 7.8% (95% CI, 7.1%–8.5%). A subgroup analysis of 1901 patients from 7 studies (including patients from Germany, Singapore, United States, Australia, and The Netherlands) demonstrated a higher pooled prevalence of 14.9% (95% CI, 13.3%–16.6%).37 , 46 , 47 , 59 , 63 , 68 , 70 This is in comparison to the prevalence of symptoms in studies from China, which was 5.2% (95% CI, 4.4%–5.9%) (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 7).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plot of the prevalence of nausea/vomiting in all patients.

Supplementary Figure 7.

Supplementary Figure 7

Forest plot of the prevalence of nausea/vomiting as one of the initial symptoms in all patients regardless of hospitalization status.

Abdominal pain

A total of 15 studies including 4031 COVID-19 patients (confirmed by laboratory RT-PCR testing) were included in the overall analysis for abdominal pain.21 , 23 , 27 , 37 , 50 , 54 , 55 , 59 , 63 , 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 , 76 The pooled prevalence of abdominal pain was 3.6% (95% CI, 3.0%–4.3%). A subgroup analysis of 1584 patients from the United States, Australia, South Korea, and The Netherlands, demonstrated a slightly higher pooled prevalence of 5.3% (95% CI, 4.2%–6.6)% compared with studies from China 2.7% (95% CI, 2.0%–3.4%), which included 10 studies of 2447 patients.37 , 59 , 63 , 69 , 70 The symptoms were variably described as stomachache, epigastric pain, and abdominal discomfort, without further details regarding the quality or nature of pain (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure 8).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forest plot of the prevalence of abdominal pain in all patients.

Supplementary Figure 8.

Supplementary Figure 8

Forest plot of the prevalence of abdominal pain as one of the initial symptoms in all patients regardless of hospitalization status.

Stool shedding

Our study selection criteria prioritized including studies with diarrhea as a GI manifestation and avoiding overlap in populations and, therefore, did not include a comprehensive set of studies reporting on stool shedding. A recently published systematic review by Cheung et al10 found a 48.1% (95% CI, 38.3%–59.7%) pooled prevalence of stool samples positive for virus RNA in 12 studies. Stool RNA was positive in 70.3% of samples taken from patients after respiratory specimens were no longer positive for the virus.

From the 57 studies included in our analysis, 4 studies reported on presence of viral RNA in stool.24 , 32 , 57 , 68 Of these, 3 studies were published after the systematic review by Cheung et al.10 First, Dreher et al68 conducted a retrospective cohort study in Germany, stratifying patients by presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome. In this study, 8 of 50 patients had diarrhea, and stool PCR was positive in 15 of 50 patients. In a US study by Kujawski et al,57 stool PCR was positive in 7 of 10 patients. Finally, in a case series from Germany by Wolfel et al,32 the authors not only examined stool RNA but also tried to isolate virus from laboratory specimens. In this study, 2 of 9 patients had diarrhea as an initial symptom and stool PCR remained positive for up to 11 days, but notably, the authors were unable to isolate infectious virus, despite a high stool viral RNA load, even though the virus was successfully isolated from respiratory specimens. The authors concluded that stool is not a primary source of spread of infection.32 Conversely, in a letter published by Wang et al,78 the authors collected 1070 specimens from 205 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and 44 of 153 stool specimens (29%) were positive for viral RNA. Four specimens with high copy numbers were cultured and electron microscopy was performed to detect live virus, which was observed in the stool from 2 patients who did not have diarrhea. The authors concluded that although this does not confer infectivity, it raised the possibility of fecal–oral transmission.78 The small sample size of the reports that assessed the presence of live virus in stool combined with the conflicting findings limit our certainty in the evidence and thus the question of fecal–oral transmission remains unsettled.

What Are the Liver Manifestations of COVID-19?

Based on our inclusion strategy, 34 of the 57 studies (60%) reported any data on liver abnormalities.20, 21, 22 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 34, 35, 36 , 38 , 41, 42, 43 , 45 , 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 , 55 , 57 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 65, 66, 67 , 70, 71, 72 , 75 , 76 The majority of the studies that reported data on LFTs only reported continuous summary statistics (median and interquartile range) without reporting the number of patients with abnormal levels. Abnormal aspartate transaminase (AST), defined as any value above the upper limit of normal (ULN), was reported in 15.0% (95% CI, 13.6%– 16.5) of patients across 16 studies, including 2514 COVID-19 patients. Abnormal alanine transaminase (ALT), defined as any value above the ULN, was reported in 15.0% (95% CI, 13.6%–16.4%) of patients across 17 studies including 2711 COVID-19 patients. Abnormal bilirubin, defined as any value above the ULN, was reported in 16.7% (95% CI, 15.0%–18.5%) of patients across 10 studies including 1841 COVID-19 patients. All patients had confirmed COVID-19 by laboratory RT-PCR testing.

The study by Cholankeril et al70 reported that 26 of 65 patients (40%) had abnormal liver enzymes and 22 of them had normal baseline liver enzymes. None of the remaining studies provided any information regarding the status of LFTs before the infection. One study by Fu et al65 reported summary statistics (median and interquartile range) of LFTs for 23 patients on admission and discharge with no clinically important changes. However, they did not provide the number of patients who presented with normal or abnormal LFTs and how many of them improved or worsened. None of the included studies reported the workup of LFTs in the settings of COVID-19 or assessed whether they were related to alternative etiologies, especially medications. Thirteen studies reported on the association between the presence of liver injury at presentation and severity of disease or outcomes. Most of them reported the results of univariate analyses.20 , 22 , 27 , 38 , 45 , 48 , 51 , 53 , 55 , 63 , 67 , 71 , 72 The study by Hajifathalian et al63 reported the results of multivariate analyses that included multiple variables and showed liver injury at presentation was associated with high risk for admission, as well as higher risk of intensive care unit admission and/or death as a composite outcome63 (Supplementary Figure 10, Supplementary Figure 11, Supplementary Figure 9).

Supplementary Figure 10.

Supplementary Figure 10

Forest plot of the prevalence of elevated ALT.

Supplementary Figure 11.

Supplementary Figure 11

Forest plot of the prevalence of elevated total bilirubin.

Supplementary Figure 9.

Supplementary Figure 9

Forest plot of the prevalence of elevated AST.

Rationale for Best Practice Statements

  • 1.

    In outpatients with new-onset diarrhea, ascertain information about high-risk contact exposure; obtain a detailed history of symptoms associated with COVID-19, including fever, cough, shortness of breath, chills, muscle pain, headache, sore throat, or new loss of taste or smell; and obtain a thorough history for other Gl symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain.

  • 2.

    In outpatients with new-onset Gl symptoms (eg, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea), monitor for symptoms associated with COVID-19, as GI symptoms may precede COVID-related symptoms by a few days. In a high COVID-19 prevalence setting, COVID-19 testing should be considered.

  • 3.

    In hospitalized patients with suspected or known COVID-19, obtain a thorough history of GI symptoms (ie, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea), including onset, characteristics, duration, and severity.

The overall prevalence of GI symptoms in context of COVID-19, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, is lower than estimated previously.10 It is important to note that the majority of studies were focused on hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and the prevalence of diarrhea in patients with mild symptoms who were not hospitalized is not known. Therefore, the reported prevalence rates may represent either an overestimate or underestimate. Information about the frequency and severity of diarrhea symptoms was inadequately reported in the majority of studies.

Based on our analysis, among hospitalized patients, the prevalence of diarrhea as the only presenting symptom in the absence of other COVID-related symptoms was very low. The majority of patients with diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting also presented with accompanying symptoms typically associated with COVID-19. In a handful of studies, diarrhea and nausea preceded the development of other COVID-19–related symptoms. In a US case–control study of 278 COVID-19 patients, patients with GI symptoms were more likely to have illness duration of 1 week or longer (33%) compared to patients without GI symptoms (22%). This may have been attributable to a delay in testing.47 Therefore, in high prevalence settings, among patients presenting with new-onset diarrhea, monitoring for the development of COVID-19 symptoms and considering referring patients for COVID-testing is reasonable, especially if testing capacity is not limited.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recently expanded the criteria for COVID-19 testing to include presence of olfactory and gustatory symptoms as triggers for testing, as these symptoms have been demonstrated to occur in up to 80% of patients.79 As of April 19, 2020, diarrhea as an initial preceding symptom of COVID-19 has not been included on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention symptom checklist.

To more accurately inform our understanding of the true prevalence of diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting as a manifestation of COVID-19, it is critical to systematically collect information about onset of diarrhea; duration of symptoms; and documentation of whether and how long symptoms of diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting precede upper respiratory infection symptoms. Therefore, we advise health care professionals and researchers to obtain a thorough review of systems, systematically inquire about respiratory and GI symptoms, and ascertain information about exposure.

  • 4.

    There is presently inadequate evidence to support stool testing for diagnosis or monitoring of COVID-19 as part of routine clinical practice.

While stool shedding has been reported in a prior meta-analysis in 48.1% of specimens, 2 small case series showed conflicting findings about the presence of living virus in stool.10 , 32 , 78 Therefore, stool infectivity and transmission have not been confirmed. Further studies are needed to determine whether isolated virus from stool specimens confers infectivity and determine the role of stool testing is in patients with COVID-19.

  • 5.

    In patients (outpatients or inpatients) with elevated LFTs in context of suspected or known COVID-19, evaluate for alternative etiologies.

  • 6.

    In hospitalized patients with suspected or known COVID-19, obtain baseline LFTs at the time of admission and consider LFT monitoring throughout the hospitalization, particularly in the context of drug treatment for COVID-19.

  • 7.

    In hospitalized patients undergoing drug treatment for COVID-19, evaluate for treatment-related Gl and hepatic adverse effects.

Abnormal LFTs were reported in approximately 15% of patients across the pooled studies, but with variable reporting of mean or median values for the whole sample of patients. While the studies used in this analysis helped us to better understand the prevalence of abnormal LFTs among hospitalized patients, LFT abnormalities were not consistently reported across studies. Also, many of the studies in this analysis did not report on how many patients had underlying liver disease and whether these patients were at an elevated risk of having increased LFTs in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, diagnostic evaluation of abnormal LFTs on admission was not performed routinely, such as testing for viral hepatitis or other etiologies. The available studies suggest that abnormal LFTs are more commonly attributable to secondary effects (eg, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, cytokine storm, ischemic hepatitis/shock, sepsis, and drug hepatotoxicity) than primary virus-mediated hepatocellular injury.7 , 9 , 80 However, liver histopathology from patients with COVID-19 have revealed mild lobular and portal inflammation and microvesicular steatosis suggestive of either virally mediated or drug-induced liver injury.81 In addition, some studies have revealed that abnormal LFTs at hospital admission may be associated with a higher risk for severe COVID-19 (odds ratio, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.19–6.3).9 Therefore, we advise checking baseline LFTs in all patients on admission and monitoring of LFTs throughout the hospitalization, particularly in patients undergoing drug therapy for COVID-19 associated with potential hepatotoxicity. We additionally advise that all patients with abnormal LFTs undergo an evaluation to investigate non–COVID-19 causes of liver disease.

What Are Common Gastrointestinal/Liver Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Treatments?

`There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration–approved routine treatments for COVID-19. The FDA has issued an emergency use authorization for 3 therapies: choloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, and convalescent plasma.82 In China and Japan, favipiravir has been approved for the treatment of COVID-19. Numerous medications are under investigation; the World Health Organization is spearheading a multinational, multicenter trial for the 5 treatments highlighted below.83 We aim to provide a summary of the Gl and liver adverse effects of the most commonly utilized medications for COVID-19 at this time, irrespective of their efficacy. Medication GI-related adverse events are summarized in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 (direct evidence sources and indirect evidence sources).

Antimalarial Medications

Although efficacy and subsequent optimal dosing in COVID-19 is still under investigation, both chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are currently FDA-approved in the United States for other indications (ie, malaria and systemic lupus erythematosus) and now have an emergency use authorization for use in COVID-19.

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine

Both chloroquines have reported infrequent Gl adverse effects (ie, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea).84 , 85 The National Institute of Health LiverTox resource rates both drugs with a likelihood score of D (possible rare cause of clinically apparent liver injury).86 Chloroquine is rarely linked to aminotransferase elevations or clinically apparent liver injury. In patients with acute intermittent porphyria or porphyria cutanea tarda, it can trigger a hypersensitivity attack with fever and serum aminotransferase elevations, sometimes resulting in jaundice. This is seen less commonly with hydroxychloroquine. Such reactions are thought to be hypersensitivity reactions and there is no known cross-reactivity in liver injury between hydroxychloroquine and choloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine is known to concentrate in the liver, thus patients with hepatitis or other hepatic diseases, or patients taking other known hepatotoxic drugs, should exercise caution. In addition, cardiac conduction defects leading to clinically relevant arrhythmias are an important adverse effect of these medications.

Antiviral Medications

Remdesivir

Limited data regarding GI adverse events are available, as phase 3 trials are still underway. Based on studies regarding Ebola, there have been reports of elevated transaminases, although the severity and incidence have not been quantified.87 There is 1 published case series (n = 53) on compassionate use of remdesivir in COVID-19.88 In this study, the most common adverse effects were notably Gl and hepatotoxicity. Five of 53 patients (9%) experienced diarrhea and 12 of 53 patients (23%) had reported elevations in hepatic enzymes associated with remdesivir. Of 4 patients (8%) who discontinued treatment prematurely, 2 were due to elevated aminotransferases.

Lopinavir/ritonavir

The combination lopinavir/ritonavir is FDA-approved for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). More recently, it was utilized to treat MERS and SARS. There is 1 trial by Cao et al89 that randomized 199 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 to receive treatment to lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 99) or placebo (n = 100) for 14 days. GI adverse events were most common among those in the treatment group, and were the primary reason for medication discontinuation; of patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir, there were 9.5% (9 of 99) with nausea, 6.3% (6 of 99) with vomiting, 4.2% (4 of 99) with diarrhea, 4.2% (4 of 99) with abdominal discomfort, 4.2% (4 of 99) with reported stomach ache, and 4.2% (4 of 99) with diarrhea. Additionally, there were 2 serious adverse events of acute gastritis, which both led to drug discontinuation. When lopinavir/ritonavir is used in patients with HIV, diarrhea is the most common GI adverse events (10%–30%), with greater prevalence among those receiving higher doses. Other GI adverse events in HIV are similar to Cao et al’s RCT, with nausea in 5%–15% and vomiting in 5%–10% of patients90 (Table 3 ).

Table 3.

Gastrointestinal Treatment Adverse Effects of Currently Utilized COVID-19 Therapies

Medication type Medication name Adverse effects
Major drug–drug interactions
Gastrointestinal Hepatic
Antimalarial Chloroquine
Hydroxychloroquine
Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea reported; frequency not defined Likelihood score: D (possible rare cause of clinically apparent liver injury).
Description: Rare elevations in aminotransferases. Most reactions are hypersensitivity with no known cross reactivity to hepatic injury. If this occurs, reasonable to switch between chloroquine therapies.
Substrate for CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 substrate
Same as above; also substrate for CYP3A5 and CYP2C8
Antiviral Remdesivir Not reported (limited data available) Likelihood score: Not scored.
Description: Hepatotoxicity reported; frequency not yet known.
Not a significant inducer/inhibitor of CYP enzymes
Lopinavir/ritonavir Nausea and vomiting: 5%–10% (higher in children: 20%)
Abdominal pain: 1%–10%
Diarrhea: 10%–30% + dose-dependent
Other: dysguesia in adults <2%, children: 25%, increased serum amylase, lipase: 3%–8%.
Likelihood score: D (possible, rare cause of clinically apparent liver injury).
Description: Hepatotoxicity ranges from mild elevations in aminotransferases to acute liver failure.
Recovery takes 1–2 mo.
Re-challenging may lead to recurrence and should be avoided if possible.
Substrate for: CYP3A4, CYP2D6
P-gp
Inducer for: CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, UGT1A1
Inhibitor for: CYP3A4
Favipiravir Nausea/vomiting: 5%–15%
Diarrhea: 5%
Limited data available
Likelihood score: Not scored
Description: 3% prevalence, but few data available.
Inhibitor for: CYP2C8 and aldehyde oxidase
Metabolized by xanthine oxidase and aldehyde oxidase

The Cao et al89 RCT did not show a significant increase in hepatotoxicity in the treatment compared to the control group. However, in patients with HIV, there is a well-documented known risk of hepatotoxicity, with liver injury severity ranging from mild enzyme elevations to acute liver failure.91 Moderate-to-severe elevations in serum aminotransferases, defined as more than 5 times the ULN, are found in 3%–10%.91 Rates may be higher in patients with concurrent HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infection. In some cases, mild asymptomatic elevations are self-limited and can resolve with continuation of the medication, but re-challenging the medication can also lead to recurrence and, therefore, should be avoided when possible. Acute liver failure, although reported, is rare. Ritonavir has potent effects on cytochrome P450 and therefore affects drug levels of a large number of medications typically given in GI practices.

Favipiravir

There are 2 published studies on favipiravir in COVID-19. The first is an open-label RCT for favipiravir vs arbidol conducted in Wuhan, China by Chen et al.92 This study reported digestive tract reactions, including nausea, “anti-acid,” or flatulence in 13.79% (16 of 116) of the favipiravir group. Hepatotoxicity characterized by any elevation in AST or ALT was reported in 7.76% (9 of 116). The second is an open-label control study of favipiravir or lopinavir/ritonavir, both used in conjunction with interferon alfa, for COVID-19 by Cai et al,93 which reported diarrhea in 5.7% (2 of 35) and liver injury in 2.9% (1 of 35) (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

Limitations of the Evidence on Gastrointestinal and Liver Manifestations in Patients With COVID-19 Infection

The individual studies in our analysis were at high risk of bias. The majority of studies reported on cohorts of patients based on inclusion dates and did not specify whether these were consecutive patients. There was an inconsistent assessment of symptoms and/or laboratory tests with missing data, and none of the studies reported whether patients were systematically evaluated for GI symptoms on admission. Most studies did not report on the duration of the GI symptoms preceding the presentation. When GI symptoms were reported, it was difficult to discern whether these were isolated symptoms or whether patients also had concurrent typical COVID-19 symptoms (eg, fever cough or shortness of breath). LFTs were mostly reported as the mean/median value of the entire cohort and without cutoff values for the institution. Many of the studies did not report on underlying chronic GI or liver diseases. There was a lot of heterogeneity in our pooled estimates that could not be explained by our subgroup analysis based on geographic location. Lastly, the data on prognosis were especially difficult to analyze due to insufficient follow-up of the patients (the majority of the patients were still hospitalized at the time of publication). Finally, there was no stratification of GI-related symptoms and severity of COVID-19 or patient important outcomes, such as need for intensive care unit or survival.

There may be additional limitations of our findings based on our analysis. Due to concerns about overlapping cohorts, we used a hierarchical framework to identify unique cohorts based on the number of patients and the hospitals to analyze the prevalence of GI and liver symptoms. It is possible that we excluded relevant studies that provided more granularity regarding the GI and liver manifestations, or had more systematic assessment of outcomes. As a result, this may have led to an over- or underestimation of the pooled effect estimates. However, we have high confidence that we were able to eliminate the counting of some patients in more than 1 report by using our selection framework, unless they were transferred from one hospital to another. An important strength of this study is the appropriate statistical analysis used to pool proportions. We also reviewed gray literature from prepublication repositories, which allowed us to include a large number of studies that have not been published yet, with data from a total of 10,890 unique COVID-19 patients being included in this work. Lastly, we tried to narratively describe studies that informed us on the type of diarrhea symptoms; whether diarrhea was reported as the only presenting symptom; or diarrhea as the initial symptom that preceded other symptoms. Based on our study selection process, we may have missed studies, including smaller case series that reported on this information, and studies that were published after our inclusion period, in light of the exponential number of studies in press, under review, and on preprint servers.

Limitations of Current Evidence on Treatment-Related Adverse Effects

Most of the information regarding Gl adverse events come from indirect evidence from medications that are FDA-approved for other indications, such as the chloroquines and lopinavir/ritonavir. In particular, Gl adverse events are poorly understood for both favipiravir and remdesivir, including the frequency and severity of aminotransferase elevations and incidence of Gl manifestations. As ongoing clinical trials are completed regarding efficacy of therapy, additional data regarding Gl adverse events will emerge.

Evidence Gaps and Guidance for Research

There is insufficient evidence on the impact of COVID-19 on subgroups of patients, such as patients with inflammatory bowel disease, chronic liver disease, or liver transplant recipients on chronic immunosuppression. Early data do not indicate excess risk among patients with inflammatory bowel disease.94, 95, 96, 97, 98 A number of international registries have been established that will provide extremely valuable information about COVID-19 in these potentially vulnerable populations (www.covidibd.org; covidcirrhosis.web.unc.edu; www.gi-covid19.org). Other clinical decisions, including optimal medication management and treatment decisions, are still under investigation. We encourage clinicians to contribute to these registries to further enhance understanding in these subpopulations. Table 4 provides guidance for future studies of GI manifestations in patients with COVID-19 or other similar pathogens.

Table 4.

Guidance and Research Considerations for Future Studies of COVID-19a

Study design A prospective inception cohort study is a favorable study design.
Another study design that is informative especially when there is a need for rapid data evaluation is a retrospective inception cohort study.
Participants Enrollment of consecutive patients beginning at pandemic onset.
Specific set of symptoms that are predictive of COVID-19 infection, all symptoms should be systematically collected on presentation and before COVID-19 diagnosis is established.
  • Elicit typical upper respiratory infection symptoms (eg, cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, and fever)

  • Inquire about less typical symptoms, such as GI-specific symptoms: diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, and also other symptoms, such as anosmia, dysguesia

  • Describe the GI symptoms in detail, including initial vs late, concurrent vs isolated, duration and frequency, history, and medication initiation relating to the onset of symptoms.

Investigators should avoid:
  • Undefined sampling (convenience sampling), including undefined time periods.

  • Overlap of the same population with other publications, which can be done by coordinating efforts between the different departments within the institution.

Investigators should consider stratification for GI comorbidities, such as inflammatory bowel disease and cirrhosis
Investigators should consider stratification by outpatients vs inpatients
Laboratory Standardized laboratory confirmation should be based on nucleic acid amplification testing for SARS-CoV-2 on respiratory specimen rather than relying on radiologic suspicion on imaging studies, which are less specific
LFTs should be obtained on admission and followed throughout the hospitalization.
Changes in LFTs should be reported as normal/abnormal and the cutoff for abnormal should be specified, rather than mean and median at the individual patient level
Pattern of LFTs abnormalities, hepatocellular vs cholestatic, should be reported as well as the evaluation performed to work up the abnormalities
Baseline LFTs (prior to developing COVID-19), changes during the duration of the disease, and after resolution should be reported.
Report stool RNA testing, when available, and presence of GI symptoms at the time of testing
Disease severity Use of standardized disease severity definitions, for example, as per World Health Organization–China Joint Mission100:
  • mild-to-moderate: non-pneumonia and mild pneumonia

  • severe defined as tachypnea, oxygen saturation ≤93% at rest, or PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300 mm Hg

  • critical respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, septic shock, or other organ dysfunction or failure that requires intensive care

Patients can be stratified by:
  • Disease severity and presence of GI symptoms

  • Disease severity and LFTs

Symptoms and their duration before development of a severe stage of the disease should be reported
Outcomes Outcomes should focus on patient-important outcomes, such as death, clinical improvement or disease worsening/progression, hospital discharge; include clinical definitions (eg, threshold reached for intubation); select sufficient follow-up time to ensure outcome is obtainable.
Analysis Analysis should attempt to control for confounding variables; analysis of risk factors should include univariate followed by multivariate analyses to identify independent risk factors predicting more severe disease and poor outcomes
a

aIn the table, we specifically refer to COVID-19, but this guidance applies to any future pathogen similar to COVID-19 that presents as a viral illness with potential GI and liver manifestations.

Finally, peer-review remains critical to the process of disseminating information. Journals should add resources to expedite reviews by increasing the number of editors and reviewers to shorten the review process; maintain accuracy, high quality, and details of the data reported; as well as to avoid overlap in patients between studies or multiple studies being published on the same cohort.99

Update

Recommendations in this document may not be valid in the near future. We will conduct periodic reviews of the literature and monitor the evidence to determine whether recommendations require modification. Based on the rapidly evolving nature of this pandemic, this guideline will likely need to be updated within the next few months.

Conclusions

The global COVID-19 pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality due to severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and multiorgan failure. Although fever, cough, and shortness of breath remain the most common presenting symptoms in affected individuals, emerging data suggest that nonpulmonary symptoms affecting the GI tract and liver may be observed. Based on systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 studies and 10,890 unique patients, gastrointestinal symptoms (ie, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea) are observed in <10% of patients with COVID-19, and abnormal liver enzymes and tests (AST, ALT, and bilirubin) are observed in approximately 15%–20% of patients with COVID-19. These findings inform time-sensitive clinical guidance in the context of this pandemic to pursue careful evaluation of patients with new-onset gastrointestinal symptoms for classic and atypical symptoms of COVID-19. All hospitalized patients with COVID-19 may benefit from liver enzyme monitoring, particularly in the context of drug treatment with known hepatotoxic potential. Further research is needed to clarify the implications of SARS-CoV-2 in stool and potential impact on transmission and clinical management.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest All members were required to complete the disclosure statement. These statements are maintained at the AGA headquarters in Bethesda, Maryland, and pertinent disclosures are published with this report. None of the panel members had any conflict relevant to this guideline.

Funding This document represents the official recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and was developed by members of the AGA Clinical Guideline Committee and Clinical Practice Update Committee and approved by the AGA Governing Board. No internal or external funding was provided for the development of this guideline. Expiration date: 3 months.

Note: To access the supplementary material accompanying this article, visit the online version of Gastroenterology at www.gastrojournal.org, and at https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.001.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1.

Summary of Included Studies

Study characteristics Patient characteristics Gastrointestinal manifestations Liver Manifestationsa
Hubei Province, China
 Luo, 202050
Zhongnan Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 01/01/2020-02/20/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 1141
Survival: 3.8% (7/183) death, 96.2% recovered
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 (throat swab RT-PCR). All patients received chest CT. Details only provided for the 183 patients with GI symptoms.
Age: m 53.8 y (183 patients)
Sex: 44.3% (81/183) females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 6.0% (n = 68)
Present on admission
Abdominal pain: 3.9% (n = 45)
Present on admission
Nausea: 11.7% (n = 134)
Present on admission
Vomiting: 10.4% (119)
Present on admission
Nausea and vomiting: 3.2% (n = 37)
Present on admission
183 patients presented with GI symptoms only (diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and/or loss of appetite). 96% of them had lung lesions on chest CT
AST (183 patients) m 65.8 ± 12.7
ALT (183 patients) m 66.4 ± 13.2
 Zhou, 202020
Jinyintan Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 12/29/2019-01/31/2020
Last follow-up: 01/31/2020
n = 191
Survival: 28.3% death, 71.8% discharged
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 (confirmed with RT-PCR) who died or were discharged. Patients without key information excluded (9).
Age: M 56 y (IQR, 46–67 y)
Sex: 37.7% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: General 28%, severe: 35%, critical 28%
Diarrhea: 4.7% (9/191)
Present on admission
2 died and 7 discharged
Nausea/vomiting: 3.7% (7/191)
Present on admission
3 died and 4 discharged
Abdominal pain: NR
AST: NR
ALT >40: 31.2% (59/189)
26 died and 33 discharged
Total bilirubin: NR
 Zhang, 202023
Wuhan No. 7 Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 1/16/2020-02/03/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 140
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatient with COVID-19 (pharyngeal swab PCR) based on symptoms and chest x-ray.
Age: 57 y (range, 25–87 y)
Sex: 49.3% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 5.7% fatty liver and abnormal liver function, 5.0% chronic gastritis and gastric ulcer, 4.3% cholelithiasis, 6.4% cholecystectomy 5.0% appendectomy, 0.7% hemorrhoidectomy, 4.3% tumor surgery
Disease severity: severe 41.4% and nonsevere 58.6%
Diarrhea: 12.9% (18/139)
Present on admission
9/82 nonsevere cases and 9/57 severe cases
Nausea: 17.3% (24/139)
Present on admission
19/82 nonsevere cases and 5/57 severe cases
Vomiting: 5.0% (7/139)
Present on admission
5/82 nonsevere cases and 2/57 severe cases
Belching 5.0% (7/139)
Present on admission
4/82 nonsevere cases and 3/57 severe cases
Abdominal pain: 5.8% (8/139)
Present on admission
2/82 nonsevere cases and 6/57 severe cases
Other pathogens were detected including Mycoplasma pneumoniae in 5, respiratory syncytial virus in 1, Epstein-Barr virus in 1.
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Chen, 202072
Tongji Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 01/13/2020-02/12/2020
Last follow-up: 02/28/2020
n = 274
Survival: 52.2% death, 47.8% recovered
Inclusion: Moderate severity, severe or critically ill COVID-19 patients (throat swab or bronchoalveolar lavage RT-PCR) who were deceased or discharged.
Age: M 62.0 y (IQR, 44–70 y) sex: 37.6% female
GI/liver comorbidities: 4% hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, 1% GI diseases
Disease severity: moderate severity, severe or critically ill.
Diarrhea: 28.1% (n = 77)
Present on admission
27/113 deceased and 50/161 discharged
Nausea: 8.8% (n = 24)
Present on admission
8/113 deceased and 16/161 discharged
Vomiting: 5.8% (n = 16)
Present on admission
6/113 deceased and 10/161 discharged
Abdominal pain: 6.9% (n = 19)
Present on admission
6/113 deceased and 13/161 discharged
AST >40: 30.7% (84)
59/113 deceased and 25/161 discharged
M 30 (IQR, 22–46). Deceased M 45 (IQR, 31–67) and discharged M 25 (IQR, 20–33)
ALT >41: 21.9% (60)
30/113 deceased and 30/161 discharged
M 23 (IQR, 15–38). Deceased M 28 (IQR, 18–47) and discharged M 20 (IQR, 15–32)
Bilirubin
M 0.6 (IQR, 0.4–0.8). Deceased M 0.7 (IQR, 0.6–1.0) and discharged M 0.5 (IQR, 0.3–0.7)
 Xu, 202031
Tongji Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 1/15/2020-2/19/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 1324
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Outpatient COVID-19 patients presenting to fever clinic, based on PCR.
Age: m 48 ± 15.3 y
Sex: 50.8% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 95.9% light condition, 3.8% severe, 0.3% critical
Diarrhea: 2.1% (28)
Present on admission
Loss of appetite: 4.2%
Present on admission
Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain: NR
NR
 Shi, 202042
Renmin Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 1/1/2020-2/10/2020
Last follow-up: 2/15/2020
n = 645
Survival: 7.3% death, 5.1% discharged (416 patients)
Inclusion: Inpatient laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, consecutive. Detailed results reported for 416 patients with complete results.
Age: M 45–64 y (range, 21–95 y)
Sex: 52.9% female
GI/liver comorbidities: 1% hepatitis B infection (of 416 patients)
Severity: NR
Diarrhea: 4.5% (29)
Present on admission
Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting: NR
AST (416 patients)
M 30 (IQR, 22–43).
ALT (416 patients)
M 28 (IQR, 18–46).
Bilirubin: NR
 Han, 202062
Wuhan No.1 Hospital
Dates: 1/4/2020-2/3/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 108
Survival: NR death, NR recovered
Inclusion: Inpatients COVID-19 (confirmed by RT-PCR) with mild pneumonia, no history of other lung infection, initial CT performed.
Exclusion: CT scans performed as follow-up for COVID-19 pneumonia, or chest CT image quality insufficient for image analysis
Age: mean 45 y (range, 21–90 y)
Sex: 64.8% females
GI/liver comorbidities: Not specified
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 14% (15/108)
Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting: NR
No laboratory data reported
 Xu, 202030
Union Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 1/25/2020-2/20/2020
Last follow-up: 2/20/2020
n = 355
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19, confirmed based on RT-PCR.
Age: 45.1% aged <50 y, 41.7% aged 50–69 y, 13.2% aged ≥70 y
Sex: 45.6% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 63.1% mild, 16.9% severe, 20% critical
Diarrhea: 36.6% (130/355)
Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting NR
AST: 28.7% (102/355) m 40.8 (range, 10–475)
ALT: 25.6% (91/355) m 35.0 (range, 1–414)
Total bilirubin: 18.6% (66/355) m 0.83 (range, 0.1–29.9)
 Ma, 202049
Wuhan Leishenshan Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 3/5/2020-3/18/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 81
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 (RT-PCR on nasal and pharyngeal swabs)
Age: M 38 y (IQR, 34.5–42.5 y)
Sex: 0% female
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 2.5% mild, 86.4% moderate, 8.6% severe, 2.5% critical.
Diarrhea: 7.41% (6/81)
Nausea/vomiting: NR
Abdominal pain: NR
AST/ALT - composite report 31/81 abnormal but no threshold
AST M 23 (IQR, 12–453)
ALT M 43 (IQR, 13–799)
Bilirubin: NR
 Liu, 202054
General Hospital of Central Theater Command of PLA (Wuhan)
Dates: 2/6/2020 - 2/14/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 153 (85 tested negative but had symptoms, we did not include those patients)
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 (RT-PCR on pharyngeal swabs)
Age: M 55 y (IQR, 38.3–65 y)
Sex:39.2% female
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 9.2% (14/153)
Present on admission
Nausea: 1.3% (2/153)
Present on admission
Vomiting: 2% (3/153)
Present on admission
Abdominal pain: 0.4% (1/153)
Present on admission
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Huang, 202061
The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan (Wuhan)
Dates: 1/21/2020-2/10/2020
Last follow-up: 2/14/2020
n = 36
Survival: 100% death
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 (RT-PCR)
Age: mean 69.22 y (SD 9.64 y; range, 50–90 y)
Sex:30.56% female
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 8.33% (3/36)
Present on admission
Nausea: NR
Vomiting: NR
Abdominal pain: NR
AST: >40 58.1% (18/31)
M 43 (IQR, 30–51)
ALT: >50 13.3% (4/30)
M 26 (IQR, 18–38)
Bilirubin: >25 12.9% (4/31)
M 11.2 (IQR, 7.5–19.2)
 Mao, 202048
Union Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 1/16/2020-2/19/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 214
Survival: 1 died but not fully reported.
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 (RT-PCR from throat)
Age: m 52.7 ± 15.5 y
Sex: 59.3% female
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 58.9% nonsevere, 41.1% severe
Diarrhea: 19.2% (41/214)
Present on admission
Severe disease 14.8% (13/88), nonsevere disease 22.2% (28/126)
Abdominal pain: 4.7% (10/214), not included in the analysis
Present on admission
Severe disease 6.8% (6/88), nonsevere disease 3.2% (4/126)
Nausea and vomiting: NR
AST 26 (8–8191)
Severe 34 (8–8191), non-severe 23 (9–244)
ALT 26 (5–1933)
Severe 32.5 (5–1933), non-severe 23 (6–261)
 Ai, 202076
Xiangyang No.1 People’s Hospital
Dates: Cross-sectional study 2/9/2020
n = 102
Survival: 2.9% died, 6.9% survived, 90.2% still hospitalized
Inclusion: Inpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19
Age: m 50.4 ± 16.9 y
Sex: 49.1% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 14.3% (15)
Present on admission
Diarrhea was the first symptom in 2 patients
Nausea: 8.8% (9)
Present on admission
Vomiting: 2.0% (2)
Present on admission
Abdominal pain: 2.9% (3)
Present on admission
AST >40: 25.5% (26/102)
Mean 30.59 (SD 15.03)
ALT >50: 19.6% (20/102)
Mean 27.77 (SD 21.13)
Total bilirubin NR
 Liu, 202052
Central Hospital of Wuhan (Wuhan)
Dates: 1/2/2020-2/1/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 109
Survival: 28.4% died, NR otherwise
Inclusion: Inpatient with COVID-19 confirmed based on RT-PCR on throat swab
Age: M 62.5 y (IQR, 47.25–65 y)
Sex: 33.3% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 11% (12)
Present on admission
6/12 with ARDS and 6/12 with no ARDS
Nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain: NR
AST:
M 30 (IQR, 21–40)
No ARDS 29 (19–38); ARDS 31 (25–44)
ALT:
M 23 (IQR, 15–36)
No ARDS 23 (14–41); ARDS 24 (16–31)
Total bilirubin: NR
 Shu, 202041
Cabin Hospital of Wuhan Stadium (Wuhan)
Dates: 2/13/2020-2/29/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 545
Survival: 85.9% discharged, 14.1% still hospitalized, 0% died
Inclusion: Inpatient with COVID-19 confirmed based on RT-PCR. Severe cases requiring transfer were excluded.
Age: M 50 y (IQR, 38–58 y)
Sex: 51.2% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 0 chronic liver disease
Disease severity: 2.9% mild, 97.1% moderate, 0 severe (excluded).
Diarrhea: 8.9% (49)
Present on admission
Nausea or vomiting: 0% (0)
Present on admission
AST >45: 6.4% (35)
M 32.1 (IQR, 24.5–36.4)
ALT >50: 7.5% (41)
M 34.6 (IQR, 26.2–42.3)
Bilirubin >1.2: 34.7% (189)
M 1.1 (IQR, 0.8–1.3)
 Wei, 202034
Wuhan Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital (Wuhan)
Dates: 2/1/2020-2/28/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 100
Survival: 3% died, 1% discharged, 96% still hospitalized.
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 confirmed based on RT-PCR. Only mild cases.
Age: m 49.1 ± 17.2 y
Sex: 60% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 9% digestive system diseases, 6% chronic gastritis
Disease severity: 100% mild.
Diarrhea: 2% (2)
Present on admission
Vomiting: 2% (2)
Present on admission
AST elevated: 5 (5%)
ALT elevated: 17 (17%)
Total bilirubin abnormal: 0 (0%)
Other Chinese Provinces
 Chen, 202073
The First Affiliated Hospital of Wanan Medical College (Wuhu)
Anhui
Dates: NA (Case series)
n = 9
Survival: 100% discharged
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 confirmed on RT-PCR via swab
Age: range, 25–56 y
Sex: 44.4% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 55.6% moderately ill and 44.4% severely ill
Diarrhea: 22.2% (2)
Nausea/vomiting: 0% (0)
Abdominal pain: 0% (0)
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Zhao, 202021
First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Hefei)
Anhui
Dates: 1/21/2020-2/16/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 75
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR.
Age: M 47 y (IQR, 34–55 y)
Sex: 44% females
GI/liver comorbidities: chronic liver disease 5.3%
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 9.3% (7)
Present on admission
Abdominal pain: 1.3% (1)
Present on admission
Nausea/vomiting: NR
AST > 40: 18.7% (14)
M 27 (IQR, 21–37)
ALT >40: 20% (15)
M 23 (IQR, 14–43)
Bilirubin >1.2: 16% (12)
M 0.85 (IQR, 0.65–1.06)
ALT, ALT, and total bilirubin were not associated with elevated interleukin-6 (a study outcome)
 Zhao, 202022
Beijing YouAn Hospital
Beijing
Dates: 1/21/2020-2/8/2020
Last follow-up: 2/29/2020
n = 77
Survival: 6.5% died, 83.1% discharged, 10.4% still hospitalized
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR.
Age: m 52 ± 2 y
Sex: 55.8% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 10.4% digestive diseases
Disease severity: 74% non-severe, 26% severe
Diarrhea: 1.3% (1)
Present on admission
1/57 nonsevere and 0/20 severe
Nausea or vomiting: 7.8% (6)
Present on admission
3/57 nonsevere and 3/20 severe
Abdominal pain: NR
AST > 40: 26.0% (20)
11/57 non-severe and 9/20 severe
M 19 (IQR, 21–42)
ALT >40: 33.8% (26)
17/57 non-severe and 9/20 severe
M 28 (IQR, 20–46)
Bilirubin
NR
 Yang, 202026
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing
Dates: 12/272019-2/18/2020
Last follow-up: 2/18/2020
n = 55
Survival: 3.6% died
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19, confirmed with RT-PCR.
Age: M 44 y (IQR, 34–54 y, range, 3–85 y)
Sex: 40% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 1.8% chronic liver disease
Disease severity: 38.2% mild, 36.4% common, 23.6% severe, and 1.8% extremely severe.
Diarrhea: 3.6% (2)
Present on admission
0/21 of the patients without pneumonia on admission and 2/34 of the patients with pneumonia
Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain: NR
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Li, 202056
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing
Dates: 1/2020-2/2020
Last follow-up:
n = 83
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 and at least one abnormal CT scan. Patients with normal CT were excluded (8).
Age: m 45 ± 12.3 y
Sex: 47% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 69.9% ordinary, and 30.1% severe/critical
Diarrhea and abdominal pain: 8.4% (7)
Present on admission
Nausea or vomiting: NR
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Qi, 202045
Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing Three Georges Central Hospital, and Qianjiang Central Hospital of Chongqing
Chongqing
Dates: 1/19/2020-2/16/2020
Last follow-up: 2/16/2020
n = 267
Survival: 1.5% died, 38.6% discharged, 59.9% still hospitalized.
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR. Excluded patients with missing data (42).
Age: M 48 y (IQR, 25–65 y)
Sex: 44.2% females
GI/liver comorbidities: GI diseases 4.5%
Disease severity: 81.3% non-severe and 18.7% severe
Diarrhea: 3.7% (10)
Present on admission
7/217 nonsevere and 3/50 severe
Nausea or vomiting: 2.2% (6)
Present on admission
5/217 nonsevere and 1/50 severe
Anorexia: 17.2% (46)
Present on admission
33/217 nonsevere and 13/50 severe
Abdominal pain: NR
AST >35: 7.2% (19)
9/217 non-severe and 10/50 severe
ALT >40: 7.5% (20)
10/217 non-severe and 10/50 severe
Bilirubin >1.5: 2.2% (6)
3/217 non-severe and 3/50 severe
 Xu, 202029
Guangzhou Eighth People’s Hospital (Guangzhou)
Guangdong
Dates: 1/23/2020-2/4/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 90
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR who had baseline chest CT.
Age: M 50 y (range, 18–86 y)
Sex: 56.7% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 5.6% (5)
Vomiting: 5.6% (5)
Nausea: 2.2% (2)
NR
 Lin, 202055
The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Zhuhai)
Guangdong
Dates: 1/17/2020-2/15/2020
Last follow-up: 2/15/2020
n = 95
Survival: 0% died, 38.9% discharged, 61.1% still hospitalized
Inclusion: Inpatients with confirmed COVID-19.
Age: 45.3 ± 18.3 y
Sex: 52.6% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 78.9% non-severe, 21.1% severe
Diarrhea: 24.2% (23)
5.2% (5) present on admission.
Loose or watery stool, 2-10 bowel movements daily.
Vomiting: 4.2% (4)
0% (0) present on admission.
Nausea: 17.9% (17)
3.2% (3) present on admission.
Abdominal pain: 2.1% (2)
0% (0) present on admission.
Epigastric discomfort.
11 patients with GI symptoms did not have pneumonia.
Viral RNA detected in 31/65 patients including 22/42 who had GI symptoms and 9/23 who did not have GI symptoms.
AST >35 for females and >40 for males: 4.2% (4)
ALT >40 for females and >50 for males: 5.3% (5)
Bilirubin >1.5: 23.2% (22)
 Wen, 202033
All Shenzhen City
Guangdong
Dates: 1/1/2020-2/28/2020
Last follow-up: 2/28/2020
n = 417
Survival: 0.7% died, 71.7% discharged, 27.6% still hospitalized.
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR.
Age: m 45.4 y
Sex: 52.8% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 8.9% mild, 82.5% moderate, 8.6% severe/critical
Diarrhea: 7.0% (29)
Present on admission.
23/381 of mild/moderates and 6/36 of severe/critical
Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain: NR
ALT, AST, and bilirubin: NR
 Xu, 202028
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou), Dongguan People's Hospital (Dongguan), Foshan First People's Hospital (Foshan), Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital (Huizhou), First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (Shantou), Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University (Zhanijiang), Zhongshan City People's Hospital (Zhongshan)
Guangdong
Dates: ?-2/28/2020
Last follow-up: 2/28/2020
n = 45
Survival: death 0.2%, 24.4% discharged, 73.3% still hospitalized.
Inclusion: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.
Age: m 56.7 ± 15.4 y
Sex: 35.6% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 100% critical
Diarrhea: 0% (0)
Present on admission
AST or ALT >40: 37.8% (17)
AST (n = 44)
M 27 (IQR, 22.0–39.5)
ALT (n = 44)
M 29 (IQR, 20.1–50.0)
Bilirubin (n = 44)
M 0.91 (IQR, 0.61–1.3)
 Yan, 202027
All Hainan Province
Hainan
Dates: 1/22/2020-3/13/2020
Last follow-up: 3/13/2020
n = 168
Survival: 3.6%, 1.2% still hospitalized, 95.2% discharged.
Inclusion: Inpatient with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR.
Age: M 51 y (IQR, 36–62 y)
Sex: 51.8% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 3.6% chronic liver disease
Severity: 78.6% nonsevere, 21.4% severe
Diarrhea: 7.1% (12)
Present on admission
8/132 nonsevere, 4/36 severe
Vomiting: 4.2% (7)
Present on admission
5/132 nonsevere, 2/36 severe
Nausea: 5.4% (9)
Present on admission
6/132 nonsevere, 3/36 severe
Abdominal pain: 4.2% (7)
Present on admission
5/132 nonsevere, 2/36 severe
AST >40: 17.3% (18/104)
7/75 non-severe, 11/29 severe
ALT >40: 8.0% (9/112)
5/81 non-severe, 4/31 severe
Bilirubin >1.5: 0
M 0.51 (IQR, 0.37–0.78)
 Wang, 202035
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou)
Henan
Dates: 1/21/2020-2/7/2020
Last follow-up: 2/7/2020
n = 18
Survival: 0 died, 33.3% discharged, 66.7% still hospitalized
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19
Age: M 39 y (IQR, 29–55 y)
Sex: 50% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 16.7% (3)
Present on admission
Vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain: NR
AST or ALT elevated: 25% (4)
Bilirubin: NR
 Chen, 202071
First Hospital of Changsha (Changsha) and Loudi Central Hospital (Loudi)
Hunan
Dates: 1/23/2020-2/14/2020
Last follow-up: 2/202/2020
n = 291
Survival: 0.7% died, 54.6% discharged, 44.7% still hospitalized
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR
Age: M 46 y (IQR, 34–59 y, range, 1–84 y)
Sex: 50.2% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 5.2% chronic liver disease
Disease severity: 10% mild, 72.8% moderate, 17.2% severe/critical
Diarrhea: 8.6% (25)
Present on admission
3/29 mild, 17/212 moderate, 5/50 severe/critical
Nausea or vomiting: 5.8% (17)
Present on admission
6/29 mild, 9/212 moderate, 2/50 severe/critical
Abdominal pain: 0.3% (1)
Present on admission
0/29 mild, 0/212 moderate, 1/50 severe/critical
AST >37: 15.1% (44)
5/29 mild, 23/212 moderate, 16/50 severe/critical
M 24.7 (IQR, 19.9–31.4)
ALT >42: 10.3% (30)
4/29 mild, 16/212 moderate, 10/50 severe/critical
M 20.7 (IQR, 14.9-28.9)
Bilirubin >1.2: 9.3% (27)
4/29 mild, 17/212 moderate, 6/50 severe/critical
M 0.6 (IQR, 0.5–0.9)
 Liu, 202053
All Jiangsu Province
Jiangsu
Dates: 1/10/2020-2/18/2020
Last follow-up: 2/18/2020
n = 620
Survival: 0 died, 3.2% in ICU, 56.1% still hospitalized, 40.6% discharged
Inclusion: Inpatient with COVID-10 based on RT-PCR. Patients without records excluded.
Age: m 44.5 ± 17.2 y
Sex: 47.4% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 15.6% asymptomatic/mild, 75.8% moderate, 8.5% severe/critical
Diarrhea: 8.5% (53)
Present on admission
4/97 asymptomatic/mild, 43/469 moderate, 6/53 severe/critically ill
Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain: NR
AST (387) m 23.3 ± 18.5
m 27.3 ± 14.9 in mild/asymptomatic, 32.3 ± 17.5 in moderate, 42.9 ± 28.6 in severe/critically ill
ALT (420) m 31.0 ± 22.4
m 26.8 ± 21.6 in asymptomatic/mild, m 31.2 ± 21.1 in moderate, m 39.3 ± 32.5 in severe/critically ill
Bilirubin (460) m 0.6 ± 0.4
m 0.7 ± 0.5 mild/asymptomatic, m 0.6 ± 0.4 moderate, m 0.7 ± 0.4 severe/critically
 Fan, 202067
Shenyang Chest Hospital (Shenyang)
Liaoning
Dates: 1/20/2020-3/15/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 55
Survival: 100% recovered
Inclusion: Recovered hospitalized COVID-19 patients, based on RT-PCR.
Age: m 46.8 y
Sex: 45.5% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 85.4% mild, 14.5% severe
Diarrhea: 10.9% (6)
4/47 mild/moderate, 2/8 severe/critical
Vomiting: 7.3% (4)
2/47 mild/moderate, 2/8 severe/critical
Abdominal pain: NR
ALT m 40.6
m 27.8 in mild/moderate and m 57.1 in severe/critical
Bilirubin m 19.5
m 19.0 in mild/moderate and m 22.4 in severe/critical
AST: NR
 Yao, 202025
Tangdu Hospital (Xi’an)
Shaanxi
Dates: 1/21/2020-2/21/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 40
Survival:
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19. No baseline LFT abnormality.
Age: m 53.9 ± 15.8 y (range, 22–83 y)
Sex: 37.5% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 0% liver disease or damage.
Disease severity: 45% non-severe, and 55% severe
Diarrhea: 7.5% (3)
8 patients developed diarrhea due to lopinavir/ritonavir.
Nausea: 7.5% (3)
Vomiting and abdominal pain: NR
AST >46: 40% (16)
Occurred as early as the 4th day up to the 26th day.
ALT >66: 52.5% (21)
Occurred as early as the 4th day up to the 26th day.
Bilirubin >1.2: 25% (10)
Occurred as early as the 4th day up to the 16th day. Mostly sligh increase.
Liver injury occured in 17/22 critical cases 5/18 noncritical cases.
 Tian, 202036
Liaocheng Infectious Diseases Hospital (Liaocheng) and Liaocheng People’s Hospital (Liaocheng)
Shandong
Dates: NR
Last follow-up: NR
n = 37
Survival: 100% discharged
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19.
Age: m 44.3 ± 1.67 y
Sex: 54% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 2.7% cirrhosis/liver cancer
Disease severity: 13.5% mild, 81.1% moderate, 2.7% severe, 2.7% critical
Diarrhea or vomiting: 25.8% (8/31)
Present on admission
Vomiting or abdominal pain: NR
AST >40: 10.8% (4)
ALT >40: 5.4% (2)
Bilirbuin >1: 35.1% (13)
 Lu, 202051
Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center
Shanghai
Dates: ?-2/9/2020
Last follow-up: 2/9/2020
n = 265
Survival: 0.4% died, 17.7% discharged.
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR
Age: NR
Sex: NR
GI/liver comorbidities: 0.4%
Disease severity: 91.7% mild/moderate, 8.3% severe/critically ill
Diarrhea: 6.4% (17)
Present on admission
17/243 mild/moderate and 0/22 severe/critical
Nausea or vomiting: 2.3% (6)
Present on admission
6/243 mild/moderate and 0/22 severe/critical
Abdominal pain: NR
AST
M 24 (IQR, 19–33)
M 24 (IQR, 19–31) in mild/moderate and M 39.5 (IQR, 29.7–53.5) in severe/critical
ALT
M 23 (IQR, 15–33)
M 21 (IQR, 15–33) in mild/moderate and M 30 (24.5–34.5) in severe/critical
Bilirubin
M 0.5 (0.4–0.6)
 Fu, 202065
Chengdu Public Health Clinical Medical Center (Chengdu)
Sichuan
Dates: 1/1/2020-2/20/2020
Last follow-up: 2/29/2020
n = 52
Survival: 100% (excluded patients who were not discharged)
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR. Excluded patients who died or were not discharged.
Age: M 44.5 y (IQR, 33.0–56.5 y)
Sex: 46% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: common coronavirus pneumonia type 73.1%, severe 19.2%, critically severe 7.7%
Diarrhea: 13.5% (7/52)
Present on admission
Nausea: 1.9 % (1/52)
Present on admission
Vomiting and abdominal pain: NR
AST M 27 (IQR, 21.2–34.0)
ALT M 24 (IQR, 15.3–49)
Bilirubin 85 patients M 67.3 (IQR, 63.5–71.4)
Patients with laboratory results on admission and discharge n = 23
AST
On presentation M 27 (IQR, 23–35)
After discharge M 25 (IQR, 19–39)
ALT
On presentation M 25 (IQR, 14–41)
After discharge M 31 (IQR, 15–41)
Bilirubin
On presentation M 66 (IQR, 60–72)
After discharge M 65 (IQR, 60–69
 Fu, 202066
Third People’s Hospital of Kunming (Kunming)
Yunnan
Dates: 1/26/2020-2/15/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 36
Survival: 17% discharged, 6% ICU, 78% still hospitalized.
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based RT-PCR.
Age: 45 y
Sex: 55.6% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: mild 11% (4), common 83% (30), severe, critical 6% (2)
Diarrhea: % (3)
Present on admission
Vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain: NR
AST 11.1% (4)
ALT 11.1% (4)
Bilirubin 30.56% (11)
 Jin, 202060
First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou)
Zhejiang
Dates: 1/17/2020-02/08/2020
Last follow-up: 02/08/2020
n = 651
Survival: 0.2% death, NR for the others
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19.
Age: m 45 ± 14.4 y
Sex: 49.2% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: Severe/critical 9.8%
Diarrhea: 8.6% (56)
Present on admission and prior to treatment.
Defined as loose stool >3 times daily. Stool cultures were performed with negative results for all patients. Clostridium difficile not detected in stool and no recent antibiotic use.
Median duration was 4 d (IQR, 3–6 d, range, 1–9 d). Most was self-limiting.
Nausea/vomiting: 4.3% (28)
Present on admission.
11 only vomiting; 10 only nausea; 3 nausea, vomiting and diarrhea; 4 nausea and vomiting.
Any GI Symptom: 11.4 (74)
Nausea, vomiting or diarrhea.
21 patients lacked respiratory symptoms of coughing and sputum production, and presented only with GI symptoms
Severe/critical: 17/74 with GI symptoms vs 47/577 without GI symptom. In those with GI symptoms, risk factors for severe/critical disease were sputum production, increased lactate dehydrogenase and increased glucose on multivariate analysis.
ARDS: 5/74 with GI symptoms vs 12/577 without GI symptom
Shock: 1/74 with GI symptoms vs 1/577 without GI symptom
Liver injury: 13/74 with GI symptoms vs 51/577 without GI symptom
Mechanical ventilation: 5/74 with GI symptoms vs 12/577 without GI symptom ICU admission: 5/74 with GI symptoms vs 12/577 without GI symptom
AST >40: NR
GI symptoms M 29.4 (IQR, 29.9–38.6) vs no GI symptoms M 24.4 (IQR, 19.0–32.0)
ALT >50: NR
GI symptoms M 25.0 (IQR, 15.8–38.5) vs no GI symptoms M 21.5 (IQR, 15.0–32.8)
Total bilirubin
GI symptoms M 0.6 (IQR, 0.4–0.8) vs no GI symptoms M 0.6 (IQR, 0.4–0.8)
 Qian, 202044
Xiaoshan District People's Hospital (Hangzhou), Ningbo City First Hospital (Ningbo City), Ninghai County First Hospital (Ningbo City), Xiangshan County People's First Hospital (Ningbo City), Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University (Shaoxing)
Zhejiang
Dates: 1/20/2020-2/11/2020
Last follow-up: 2/16/2020
n = 91
Survival: 0% died, 34.1% discharged, 65.9% still hospitalized.
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 (88 based on RT-PCR and 3 based on clinical diagnosis)
Age: M 50 y (IQR, 36.5–57 y)
Sex: 59% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 90.1% mild and 9.9% severe
Diarrhea: 23.1% (21)
Present on admission
Vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain: not extracted
Not extracted
 Chen, 202074
Wenzhou Central Hospital (Wenzhou) and Sixth People’s Hospital of Wenzhou (Wenzhou)
Zhejiang
Dates: 1/11/2020-2/15/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 175
Survival: 29.7% discharge, not reported otherwise
Inclusion: Inpatients with COVID-19 based on RT-PCR.
Age: M 46 y (IQR, 34–54 y)
Sex: 52.6% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 19.4% (34)
Present on admission
Average of 6 episodes per day, and often ended within 1-4 days
Vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain: not extracted
Not extracted
 Kuang, 202058
All Zhejiang Province
Zhejiang
Dates: 1/1/2020-2/10/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 944
Survival: NR
Inclusion: All reported COVID-19 cases. Both inpatients and outpatients.
Age: m 47.4 ± 22.9 y
Sex: 49.6% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 2.7% (21)
Vomiting, nausea and abdominal pain: NR
NR
US studies
 Arentz, 202075
Evergreen Hospital (Kirkland)
Washington
Dates: 2/20/2020-3/5/2020
Last follow-up: 3/17/2020
n = 21
Survival: 52.4% died, 9.5% out of IC, 38.1% still in ICU.
Inclusion: Critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Age: m 70 y (range, 43–92 y)
Sex: 48% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 4.8% cirrhosis, 9.5% solid organ transplant
Disease severity: 100% critically ill
Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain: NR AST m 273 (range, 14-4432)
ALT m 108 (range, 11-1414)
Bilirubin m 0.6 (range, 0.2-1.1)
 Cholankeril, 202070
Stanford University Hospitals
California
Dates: 3/4/2020-3/24/2020
Last follow-up: 3/24/2020
n = 116
Survival: 0.9% died, 86.2% discharged, 4.3% still hospitalized.
Inclusion: COVID-19 confirmed based on RT-PCR.
Age: M 50 y (IQR, 35–67 y)
Sex: 46.6% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 2.6% chronic liver disease
Disease severity: 71.6% evaluated in ED/clinic only, 20.7% admitted to the medical floor, and 7.8% admitted to ICU.
Diarrhea: 10.3% (12)
Present on admission
Nausea and/or vomiting: 10.3% (12)
Present on admission
Abdominal pain: 8.8% (10)
Present on admission
None of the patients had isolated GI symptoms or as the initial symptoms.
31.9% reported GI symptoms. Median duration of GI symptoms was 1 day (IQR, 0–4).
AST (n = 65)
M 35 (IQR, 22–58)
In those with any abnormal LFT, M 64 (IQR, 24–76)
ALT (n = 65)
M 32 (IQR, 22–48)
In those with any abnormal LFT, M 59 (IQR, 22–76)
Total bilirubin (n = 65)
M 0.4 (IQR, 0.3–0.7)
In those with any abnormal LFT, M 0.5 (IQR, 0.3–0.7)
26 patients developed liver enzyme elevation. 22 of them had normal baseline liver enzymes.
 Nobel, 202047
New York–Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York
Dates: 3/10/2020-3/21/2020
Last follow-up: 18 days after testing
n = 278
Survival: 3.2% died,
Inclusion: Patients tested for COVID-19 at clinic or emergency department for respiratory symptoms with intent to hospitalize or the same symptoms in essential personnel. Excluded patients with insufficient data (42). Charts randomly selected.
Age: 11% aged 18–30 y, 25% aged 31–50 y, 37% aged 51–70 y, and 27% aged >70 y
Sex: 48% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 74.5% admitted to hospital, 15.8% admitted to ICU, 3.2% died.
Diarrhea: 20.1% (56)
Present on admission
42/207 admitted to hospital, 11/44 admitted to ICU, 0/9 died.
Vomiting/vomiting: 22.7% (63)
Present on admission
51/207 admitted to hospital, 8/44 admitted to ICU, 0/9 died.
Abdominal pain: NR
35% had GI symptoms. Patients with GI symptoms were more likely to have illness duration of ≥1 week (33%) compared to patients without symptoms (22%).
Presence of GI symptoms (diarrhea or nausea/vomiting) was associated with a 70% increased risk of testing positive (adjusted odds ratio 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.5)
AST: NR
ALT: NR
Bilirubin: NR
 Hajifathalian, 202063
NewYork-Presbytarian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York
Dates: 3/4/2020 to 4/9/2020
Last follow-up: 4/16/2020
n = 1059 (768 inpatients and 291 outpatients)
Survival: 9.1% died
Inclusion: Adults with COVID-19, inpatients and outpatients.
Age: m 61 ± 18 y
Sex: 42.3% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 1.6% IBD, 3.0% chronic liver disease, 2.4% solid organ transplant.
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 22.1% (234)
Present on admission
Inpatients 24.3% (187/768) and outpatients 16.1% (47/291).
Vomiting: 8.3% (91)
Present on admission
Inpatients 8.7% (67/768) and outpatients 8.2% (24/291).
Nausea: 15.3% (168)
Present on admission
Inpatients 16.0% (123/768) and outpatients 15.5% (45/291).
Abdominal pain: 6.6% (72)
Present on admission
Inpatients 7.3% (56/768) and outpatients 5.5% (16/291).
AST ≥40: 56% (n = 844) m 60 ± 79
ALT ≥40: 39% (n = 844) m 50 ± 65
Bilirubin >1.2: 11% (n = 844) m 0.7 ± 0.6
Presence of liver injury at presentation was associated with higher risk of admission on multivariate analysis.
 Kujawski, 202057
Center of Disease Control
California, Illinois, Arizona, Massachusetts, Washington, Wisconsin
Dates: 1/20/2020-2/5/2020
Last follow-up: 2/22/2020
n = 12
Survival: 0% died, 8.3% hospitalized, 41.7% home isolation, 50% recovered.
Inclusion: Patients under investigation who tested positive for COVID-19.
Age: M 53 y (range, 21–68 y)
Sex: 33.3% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 8.3% HBV and 8.3% fatty liver disease.
Disease severity: 5 outpatients and 7 inpatients.
Diarrhea: 33.3% (4)
8.3% (1) present on admission
3 while on remdesivir (1 of tham had Giardia and C difficile). 1 patient had symptoms for 1 day then developed fever and cough.
Nausea: 25% (3)
8.3% (1) present on admission
Abdominal pain: 16.7% (2)
Stool PCR positive in 70% (7/10) patients
AST: 58.3% (7)
M 129 (IQR, 46–190)
ALT 58.3% (7)
M 136 (IQR, 66–389)
Bilirubin
NR
 Rubin, 202043
Stanford University School of Medicine
California
Dates: ?-3/11/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 54
Survival: NR.
Inclusion: COVID-19 patients, not clear otherwise.
Age: M 53.5 y (IQR, 32–75 y, range, 20–91 y)
Sex: 46.3% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 1.8% HBV
Disease severity: 33.3% inpatients and 66.7% outpatients
Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain: NR AST
Females m 73.4 ± 61.8 (9) and males m 45.1 ± 19.5 (14)
ALT
Females m 69.6 ± 65.2 (9) and males m 43.9 ± 25.8 (13)
Bilirubin
NR
Other countries
 COVID-19 National Emergency Response Center, 202069
South Korea
Dates: 1/10/2020-2/14/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 28
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatients or outpatient with COVID-19
Age: m 42.6 y (range, 20–73 y)
Sex: 46.1% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 7%% (2)
Present on admission
1 started 2 d after fevers and chills and 1 started 2 d after muscle aches
Abdominal pain: 4% (1)
Present on admission
Stomachache 2 d after muscle ache
Vomiting and nausea: NR
NR
 Young, 202024
Singapore
Dates: 1/23/2020-2/3/2020
Last follow-up: 2/25/2020
n = 18
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Inpatients COVID-19 based on RT-PCR
Age: M 47 y (range, 31–73 y)
Sex: 50% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR (12 patients uncomplicated (67%) 6 required oxygen (33%)
Diarrhea: 17% (3)
Present on admission
None of these patients required supplemental oxygen
Vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain: NR
Virus detected by PCR in stool in 4/8 (50%) and in whole blood 1/12 (8%)
4 of the 5 patients treated with lopinavir-ritonavir developed nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea, and 3 developed abnormal liver function test results
NR
 Sun, 202039
The National Centre for Infectious Diseases
Singapore
Dates: 1/26/2020-2/16/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 54
Survival: NR
Inclusion: Patients referred for testing for COVID-19.
Age: M 42 y (IQR, 34–54 y)
Sex: 46% females
GI/liver comorbidities: 0 liver disease
Disease severity: NR
GI symptoms: 37% (20/54)
General GI symptoms per different models were associated with positive COVID adjusted odds ratio. 3.73 (95% CI, 1.23–12.45)
AST, ALT, and bilirubin NR
 Pung, 202046
Singapore
Dates: ?-2/15/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 17
Survival: 0% died
Inclusion: Inpatients COVID-19 based on PCR
Age: M 40 y (36–51 y)
Sex:59 % females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 23.5% (4)
Nausea/Vomiting: 5.9%% (1)
Abdominal pain: NR
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Tabata, 202038
Diamond Princess Cruise
Japan
Dates: 2/11/2020-2/25/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 104
Survival: 0% died, NR othewise
Inclusion: Laboratory confirmed patients with COVID-19 on Diamond Princess Cruise ship
Age: M 68 y (IQR, 46.8–75 y; range, 25–93 y)
Sex: 54.8% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 31.7% asymptomatic, 41.3% mild, 26.9% severe.
Diarrhea: 9.6% (8)
Present on admission.
2 additional patients develop diarrhea during the hospitalization
Vomiting, nausea and abdominal pain: NR
AST >38: 17.3% (18)
9/76 (11.8%) nonsevere and 9/28 (32.1%) severe
ALT >45: 16.3% (17)
10/76 (13.2%) nonsevere and 7/28 (25%) severe
Bilirubin: NR
 Kluytmans, 202059
Breda and Tiburg, The Netherlands
Dates: 3/7/2020-3/12/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 86
Survival: 0 deaths, 2 required short hospitalization.
Inclusion: Health care workers with fever or mild respiratory symptoms more than 10 d with subsequent positive tests. Outpatients.
Age: M 49 y (range, 22–66 y)
Sex: 4.6% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: 2 hospitalized, 19 recovered
Diarrhea: 18.6% (16)
Interviewed within 7 d of onset of symptoms: 5/31,
Interviewed after 7 d of onset of symptoms: 11/55
Decreased appetite or nausea: 17.4% (15)
Interviewed within 7 d of onset of symptoms: 1/31,
Interviewed after 7 d of onset of symptoms: 14/55
Abdominal pain: 5.8% (5)
Interviewed within 7 d of onset of symptoms: 1/31
Interviewed after 7 d of onset of symptoms: 3/55
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Wolfel, 202032
Munich, Germany
Dates: 1/23/2020-?
Last follow-up: NR
n = 9
Survival: NR
Inclusion: lab confirmed SARS-Co-V-2 in upper respiratory specimens
Age: NR
Sex: NR
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 22% (2)
Present on admission
Diarrhea was never the only symptom
PCR was positive for up to 11 d;
Authors were not able to isolate infectious virus, despite high stool RNA viral loads.
Vomiting, nausea and abdominal pain: NR
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Dreher, 202068
Aachen, Germany
Dates:
2/1/2020-3/1/2020
Last follow-up:
NR
n = 50
Survival: 14% died, 16% discharged, 70% still hospitalized
Inclusion: Inpatients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19
Age: median 65 y (IQR, 58–76 y)
Sex: 34% females
GI/liver comorbidities: chronic liver failure 8%, chronic hepatitis 10%
Disease severity: 48% ARDS,
52% non-ARDS
Diarrhea: 16% (8/50)
Present on admission
6/24 ARDS, 2/26 non-ARDS
Nausea: 1/50
Present on admission
0/24 ARDS, 1/26 nonARDS
Vomiting: 2/50
Present on admission
1/24 ARDS, 1/26 non-ARDS
Stool PCR done in 15 patients and found positive in 2 patients with ARDS
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Gritti, 202064
Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
Bergamo, Italy
Dates:
3/11/2020-3/24/2020
Last follow-up: NR
n = 21
Survival: 4.7% died, NR for the others
Inclusion: Inpatients with confirmed COVID-19 who received
Age: m 64 y (range, 48–75 y)
Sex: 14% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 23.8% (5)
Present on admission
Nausea or vomiting, or abdominal pain: NR
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 Spiteri, 202040
Germany, Finland, Italy, Russia, Spain, France, Sweden, and Belgium
Dates:
1/24/2020-2/21/2020
Last follow-up:
2/21/2020
n = 38
Survival: 2.6% died, 11.4% still hospitalized
Inclusion: Inpatients (n = 35) and outpatients (N=2) with COVID-19 confirmed based on RT-PCR
Age: M 42 (range, 2–81 y)
Sex: 34.2% females
GI/liver comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 3.2% (1/31)
Present on diagnosis
Nausea: 3.2% (1/31)
Present on diagnosis
Abdominal pain: NR
AST, ALT, and bilirubin: NR
 COVID-19 National Incident Room Surveillance Team, 202037
Australia
Dates: National data until 3/14/2020
Last follow-up: 3/14/2020
n = 295
Survival: 1.0% died
Inclusion: All individuals with COVID-19 (both outpatients and inpatients)
Age: M 47 y (range, 0–94 y)
Sex: (approximately) 50% female
Comorbidities: NR
Disease severity: NR
Diarrhea: 16.3% (48)
Nausea/vomiting: 11.5% (34)
Abdominal pain: 2.0% (6)
No laboratory data reported

ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CT, computed tomography; HBV, hepatitis B virus; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; M, median; m, mean; ±, standard deviation; NR, not reported.

a

AST and ALT are reported as units per liter while bilirubin is reported as milligrams per deciliter.

Supplementary Table 2.

Direct Evidence of Proposed COVID-19 Therapies

Medication class Medication Sourcea Study Design GI adverse effects
Nausea/vomiting Abdominal pain Diarrhea Jaundice Hepatotoxicity
Antiviral Favipiravir Cai, 2020109 Open-label control study (favipiravir and lopinavir/ ritonavir) for COVID-19 NR NR 2/35 (5.7%) had diarrhea 1/35 (2.9%)
Chen, 202092 Open-label RCT for favipiravir vs arbidol (n = 120) in COVID-19 “Digestive tract reactions” 16/116 (13.79%) NR 9/116 (7.76%)
Lopinavir/ritonavir Cao,89 2020 RCT in severe COVID-19 (n = 199) 10/95 with nausea + 6/96 vomiting (reported separately) vs 0/99 with nausea and 0/99 with vomiting in control 4/95 in treatment group vs 2/99 in control group 4/95 in treatment group vs 0/99 in control group 6/95 in treatment group vs. 5/99 in control group Elevated AST: 4/95 in treatment vs. 9/99 in control group; Elevated ALT: 2/95 in treatment vs 5/99 in control group
Remdesivir Holshue,103 2020 Case report (first COVID in United States): remdesvir given day 7; no adverse events reported
Antimalarial Chloroquine Cortegiani,104 2020 Systematic review on efficacy and safety in COVID-19 Not reported in systematic review or primary studies
Hydroxychloroquine

NR, not reported.

a

Sources include existing systematic reviews where possible. If not available, primary sources are listed.

Supplementary Table 3.

Indirect Evidence of Proposed COVID-19 Therapies

Medication class Medication Sourcea Indirect GI adverse events
Other
Nausea/vomiting Abdominal pain Diarrhea Jaundice Hepatotoxicity
Antiviral Lopinavir/ritonavir FDA/ manufacturer's label110 HIV Nausea (5%–16%); vomiting (children 21%; adults 2%–7%) Reported 1%–11% 7%–28%; greater with once-daily dosing Increased serum ALT: 1%–11%; hepatitis including AST/ALT/GGT elevations: 4%; hyperbilirubinemia (children 3%; adults 1%) Dysgeusia (children 22%; adults <2%); hyperamylasemia (3%–8%), dyspepsia (<6%), increased lipase (3%–5%), flatulence (1-4%), gastroenteritis (3%)
NIH Liver Tox111 HIV Range from mild to ALF. Recovery takes 1–2 mo. Do not re-challenge with medication. Monitor for exacerbation of HBV/HCV
Momattin,105 2019 MERS Prevalence of GI AEs not reported in this SR
Yao,106 2020 SARS/MERS AEs not reported in this SR (can check primary studies) SARS: 2 retrospective cohort studies (combined with steroids); MERS: 1 RCT combined with IFN, 1 retrospective cohort combined with IFN/ribavirin, and 2 case reports also combined with IFN/ribavirin
Remdesivir Al-Tawfiq,107 2020 MERS
Sheahan,108 2020 MERS
Antimalarial Chloroquine FDA/ manufacturer's label/NIH Liver Tox111,112 Malaria Reported; frequency not defined Abdominal cramps reported; frequency not defined Reported; frequency not defined Rarely linked to aminotransferase elevations or clinically apparent liver injury. In patients with AIP or PCT, it can trigger an attack with fever and serum aminotransferase elevations, sometimes resulting in jaundice Minor metabolism by liver (∼30%); mostly excreted in urine Likelihood score: D (possible rare cause of clinically apparent liver injury)
Hydroxychloroquine113 FDA / Manufacturer's label Malaria / SLE Reported; frequency not defined Reported; frequency not defined Reported; frequency not defined Same as chloroquine above; can be exchanged with chloroquine as most reactions are hypersensitivity and no known cross reactivity to hepatic injury Likelihood score: D (possible rare cause of clinically apparent liver injury)

AE, adverse event; AIP, acute intermittent porphyria; ALF, acute liver failure; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IFN, interferon; NIH, National Institutes of Health; PCT, porphyria cutanea tarda; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SR, systematic review.

a

Sources include existing systematic reviews where possible. If not available, primary sources are listed.

References

  • 1.Lu R., Zhao X., Li J. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395:565–574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Huang C., Wang Y., Li X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dong E., Du H., Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:533–534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.CDC COVID-19 Response Team Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:343–346. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6912e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Richardson S., Hirsch J.S., Narasimhan M. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020 Apr 22 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xiao F., Tang M., Zheng X. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1831–1833.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang C., Shi L., Wang F.S. Liver injury in COVID-19: management and challenges. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:428–430. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30057-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu L., Liu J., Lu M. Liver injury during highly pathogenic human coronavirus infections. Liver Int. 2020;40:998–1004. doi: 10.1111/liv.14435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai Q., Huang D., Yu H. Characteristics of liver tests in COVID-19 patients. J Hepatol. 2020 Apr 13 doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.042. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheung K.S., Hung I.F., Chan P.P. Gastrointestinal manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection and virus load in fecal samples from the Hong Kong cohort and systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr 3 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.065. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen Q., Allot A., Lu Z. Keep up with the latest coronavirus research. Nature. 2020;579:193. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00694-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bauchner H., Golub R.M., Zylke J. Editorial concern—possible reporting of the same patients with COVID-19 in different reports. JAMA. 2020 Mar 6 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3980. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schunemann H.J., Cuello C., Akl E.A. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sultan S., Falck-Ytter Y., Inadomi J.M. The AGA institute process for developing clinical practice guidelines part one: grading the evidence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:329–332. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Balduzzi S., Rucker G., Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019;22:153–160. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.R Core Team . R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barendregt J.J., Doi S.A., Lee Y.Y. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:974–978. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Murad M.H., Sultan S., Haffar S. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23:60–63. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou F., Yu T., Du R. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao Z., Xie J., Yin M. Clinical and laboratory profiles of 75 hospitalized patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 in Hefei, China. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.01.20029785. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao W., Yu S., Zha X. Clinical characteristics and durations of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Beijing: a retrospective cohort study. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.13.20035436. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang J.J., Dong X., Cao Y.Y. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. 2020 Feb 19 doi: 10.1111/all.14238. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Young B.E., Ong S.W.X., Kalimuddin S. Epidemiologic features and clinical course of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. JAMA. 2020 Mar 3 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3204. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yao N., Wang S.N., Lian J.Q. [Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia combined with liver injury in Shaanxi region] Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2020;28:E003. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200226-00070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang P., Ding Y., Xu Z. Epidemiological and clinical features of COVID-19 patients with and without pneumonia in Beijing, China. medRxiv. 2020 2020.02.28.20028068. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yan S., Song X., Lin F. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in Hainan, China. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.19.20038539. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu Y., Xu Z., Liu X. Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.03.20030668. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu X., Yu C., Qu J. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:1275–1280. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04735-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu S., Fu L., Fei J. Acute kidney injury at early stage as a negative prognostic indicator of patients with COVID-19: a hospital-based retrospective analysis. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.24.20042408. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu H., Yan L., Qiu C. Analysis and prediction of false negative results for SARS-CoV-2 detection with pharyngeal swab specimen in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.26.20043042. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wolfel R., Corman V.M., Guggemos W. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020 Apr 1 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wen Y., Wei L., Li Y. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in Shenzhen, the largest migrant city of China. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.22.20035246. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wei L., Jin D., Zhang J. Clinical findings of 100 mild cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan: a descriptive study. SSRN. 2020:3551332. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang L., Gao Y.H., Lou L.L. The clinical dynamics of 18 cases of COVID-19 outside of Wuhan, China. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(4) doi: 10.1183/13993003.00398-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tian S., Chang Z., Wang Y. Clinical characteristics and reasons of different duration from onset to release from quarantine for patients with COVID-19 Outside Hubei province, China. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00210. 2020.03.21.20038778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.COVID-19 National Incident Room Surveillance Team COVID-19, Australia: epidemiology report 7 (reporting week ending 19:00 AEDT 14 March 2020) Commun Dis Intell (2018) 2020;44 doi: 10.33321/cdi.2020.44.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tabata S., Imai K., Kawano S. The clinical characteristics of COVID-19: a retrospective analysis of 104 patients from the outbreak on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Japan. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30482-5. 2020.03.18.20038125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sun Y., Koh V., Marimuthu K. Epidemiological and clinical predictors of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 25 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa322. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Spiteri G., Fielding J., Diercke M. First cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the WHO European Region, 24 January to 21 February 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(9) doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.9.2000178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shu L., Wang X., Li M. Clinical characteristics of 545 cases confirmed COVID-19 in Wuhan Stadium Cabin Hospital. SSRN. 2020:3552844. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shi S., Qin M., Shen B. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 25 doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rubin S.J.S., Falkson S.R., Degner N. Clinical characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity in California. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020:1–9. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Qian G.Q., Yang N.B., Ding F. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 91 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Zhejiang, China: a retrospective, multi-centre case series. QJM. 2020 Mar 20 doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa089. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Qi D., Yan X., Tang X. Epidemiological and clinical features of 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease cases in Chongqing municipality, China: a retrospective, descriptive, multiple-center study. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.01.20029397. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pung R., Chiew C.J., Young B.E. Investigation of three clusters of COVID-19 in Singapore: implications for surveillance and response measures. Lancet. 2020;395:1039–1046. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30528-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nobel Y.R., Phipps M., Zucker J. Gastrointestinal symptoms and COVID-19: case-control study from the United States. Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr 12 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.017. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mao L., Wang M., Chen S. Neurological manifestations of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective case series study. medRxiv. 2020 2020.02.22.20026500. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ma L., Xie W., Li D. Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection upon male gonadal function: a single center-based study. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.21.20037267. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Luo S., Zhang X., Xu H. Don't overlook digestive symptoms in patients with 2019 novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar 20 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.043. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lu H., Ai J., Shen Y. A descriptive study of the impact of diseases control and prevention on the epidemics dynamics and clinical features of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Shanghai, lessons learned for metropolis epidemics prevention. medRxiv. 2020 2020.02.19.20025031. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liu Y., Sun W., Li J. Clinical features and progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome in coronavirus disease 2019. medRxiv. 2020 2020.02.17.20024166. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu S., Luo H., Wang Y. Characteristics and associations with severity in COVID-19 patients: a multicentre cohort study from Jiangsu Province, China. SSRN. 2020:3548753. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu L., Liu W., Wang S. A preliminary study on serological assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 238 admitted hospital patients. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.05.008. 2020.03.06.20031856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lin L., Jiang X., Zhang Z. Gastrointestinal symptoms of 95 cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Gut. 2020;69(6):997–1001. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li K., Wu J., Wu F. The clinical and chest CT features associated with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia. Invest Radiol. 2020;55:327–331. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kujawski S.A., Wong K.K., Collins J.P. First 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0877-5. 2020.03.09.20032896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kuang Y., Zhang H., Zhou R. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 944 cases of 2019 novel Coronavirus infection of non-COVID-19 exporting city, Zhejiang, China. SSRN. 2020:3543604. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kluytmans M., Buiting A., Pas S. SARS-CoV-2 infection in 86 healthcare workers in two Dutch hospitals in March 2020. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.23.20041913. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jin X., Lian J.S., Hu J.H. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of coronavirus-infected disease 2019 (COVID-19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut. 2020;69:1002–1009. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Huang Y., Yang R., Xu Y. Clinical characteristics of 36 non-survivors with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. medRxiv. 2020 2020.02.27.20029009. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Han R., Huang L., Jiang H. Early clinical and CT manifestations of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020:1–6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hajifathalian K., Krisko T., Mehta A. Gastrointestinal and hepatic manifestations of 2019 novel Coronavirus disease in a large cohort of infected patients from New York: clinical implications for prognosis. Gastroenterology. 2020 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gritti G., Raimondi F., Ripamonti D. Use of siltuximab in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring ventilatory support. medRxiv. 2020 2020.04.01.20048561. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fu H., Xu H., Zhang N. Association between clinical, laboratory and CT characteristics and RT-PCR results in the follow-up of COVID-19 patients. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.19.20038315. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fu H., Li H., Tang X. Analysis on the clinical characteristics of 36 cases of novel coronavirus pneumonia in Kunming. medRxiv. 2020 2020.02.28.20029173. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fan L., Liu C., Li N. Medical treatment of 55 patients with COVID-19 from seven cities in northeast China who fully recovered: a single-center, retrospective, observational study. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023923. 2020.03.28.20045955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dreher M., Kersten A., Bickenbach J. Charakteristik von 50 hospitalisierten COVID-19-Patienten mit und ohne ARDS. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117:271–278. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.COVID-19 National Emergency Response Center Epidemiology and Case Management Team, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Early epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 28 cases of coronavirus disease in South Korea. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020;11:8–14. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.1.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cholankeril G., Podboy A., Aivaliotis V.I. High prevalence of concurrent gastrointestinal manifestations in patients with SARS-CoV-2: early experience from California. Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr 10 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.008. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chen X., Zheng F., Qing Y. Epidemiological and clinical features of 291 cases with coronavirus disease 2019 in areas adjacent to Hubei, China: a double-center observational study. medRxiv. 2020 2020.03.03.20030353. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen T., Wu D., Chen H. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chen Q., Quan B., Li X. A report of clinical diagnosis and treatment of nine cases of coronavirus disease 2019. J Med Virol. 2020 Mar doi: 10.1002/jmv.25755. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chen D., Li X., Song Q. Hypokalemia and clinical implications in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) medRxiv. 2020 2020.02.27.20028530. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Arentz M., Yim E., Klaff L. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020 Mar 19 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4326. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ai J., Chen J., Wang Y. The cross-sectional study of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Xiangyang, Hubei province. medRxiv. 2020 2020.02.19.20025023. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wang D., Hu B., Hu C. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020 Feb 7 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wang W., Xu Y., Gao R. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020 Mar 11 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Center for Disease Control and Prevention Symptoms of coronavirus. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html Available at:
  • 80.Fan Z., Chen L., Li J. Clinical features of COVID-19-related liver damage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr 10 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.002. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Xu Z., Shi L., Wang Y. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:420–422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.US Food and Drug Administration Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/counterterrorism-and-emerging-threats/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19 Available at: [PubMed]
  • 83.World Health Organization “Solidarity” clinical trial for COVID-19 treatments. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments Available at: Accessed April 01, 2020]
  • 84.Aralen (chloroquine phosphate) [prescribing information] Sanofi-Aventis US LLC; Bridgewater, NJ: October 2018. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/006002s045lbl.pdf Available at: [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) [product monograph] Sanofi-aventis Canada Inc; Laval, Quebec, Canada: August 2019. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/009768s041lbl.pdf Available at: [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chloroquine. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Bethesda, MD: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mulangu S., Dodd L.E., Davey R.T., Jr. A randomized, controlled trial of Ebola virus disease therapeutics. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2293–2303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Grein J., Ohmagari N., Shin D. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 10 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016. [Epub ahed of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cao B., Wang Y., Wen D. A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1787–1799. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.AbbVie Inc; North Chicago, IL: March 2020. Kaletra (lopinavir and ritonavir) tablets and oral solution [prescribing information]https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/021251s052_021906s046lbl.pdf Available at: [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lopinavir. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Bethesda, MD: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chen C., Zhang Y., Huang J. Favipiravir versus Arbidol for COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. MedRxiv. 2020 2020.03.17.20037432. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cai Q., Yang M., Liu D. Experimental treatment with favipiravir for COVID-19: an open-label control study. Engineering (Beijing) 2020 Mar 18 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.007. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Higgins P.D.R., Ng S., Danese S. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 in immunosuppressed IBD patients. Crohns Colitis. 2020;360:2. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otaa026. otaa026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Rodriguez-Lago I., Ramirez de la Piscina P., Elorza A. Characteristics and prognosis of patients with inflammatory bowel disease during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the Basque Country (Spain) Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr 21 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.043. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rubin D.T., Feuerstein J.D., Wang A.Y. AGA Clinical practice update on management of inflammatory bowel disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: expert commentary. Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr 10 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.012. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rubin D.T., Abreu M.T., Rai V. Management of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of an international meeting. Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr 6 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.002. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Norsa L., Indriolo A., Sansotta N. Uneventful course in IBD patients during SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in northern Italy. Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr 2 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.062. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Peyrin-Biroulet L. Will the quality of research remain the same during the COVID-19 pandemic? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar 30 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.054. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.World Health Organization Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf Available at:
  • 101.Guan W.J., Ni Z.Y., Hu Y. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Guan W.J., Liang W.H., Zhao Y. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5) doi: 10.1183/13993003.00547-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Holshue M.L., DeBolt C.1, Lindquist S. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:929–936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Cortegiani A., Ingoglia G., Ippolito M. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19. J Crit Care. 2020 Mar 10 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.005. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Momattin H., Al-Ali A.Y., Al-Tawfiq J.A. A systematic review of therapeutic agents for the treatment of the Middle East Respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) Travel Med Infect Dis. 2019;30:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2019.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Yao T.T., Qian J.D., Zhu W.Y. A systematic review of lopinavir therapy for SARS coronavirus and MERS coronavirus-A possible reference for coronavirus disease-19 treatment option. J Med Virol. 2020 Feb 27 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25729. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Al-Tawfiq J.A., Al-Homoud A.H., Memish Z.A. Remdesivir as a possible therapeutic option for the COVID-19. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;34:101615. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sheahan T.P., Sims A.C., Leist S.R. Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV. Nat Commun. 2020;11:222. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13940-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cai Q, Yang M, Liu D, et al. Experimental treatment with Favipiravir for COVID-19: an open-label control study. Engineering (Beijing) 2020. 10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.007. Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 110.U. S. Food and Drug Administration. KALETRA (lopinavir and ritonavir) prescribing Information. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/021251s052_021906s046lbl.pdf; Accessed April 27, 2020.
  • 111.National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD); 2012. Lopinavir. [Updated 2017 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547961/. Accessed April 27, 2020.
  • 112.U. S. Food and Drug Administration. ARALEN (chloroquine phosphate) prescribing Information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/006002s044lbl.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2020.
  • 113.U. S. Food and Drug Administration. PLAQUENIL (hydroxychloroquine sulfate) prescribing Information. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/009768s037s045s047lbl.pdf; Accessed April 27, 2020.

Articles from Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES