Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;5(1):86–96. doi: 10.1136/svn-2019-000309

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparison of cognitive function between ischaemic subtypes for adult patients with moyamoya disease. For ischaemic patients, the headache subtype performed better than the TIA subtype, which was better than infarction ones. However, no significant difference between three ischaemic subtypes could be found (p>0.05). Moreover, the cognitive function of the headache subtype performed worse than that of HCs, but there was no significant difference between these two groups (p>0.05). Details could be found in online supplementary material tables 6 and 7. *, p<0.05; #, p<0.01. AT, attention; BD, block design; C-CAMPROMPT, Cambridge Prospective Memory Test; CC, category completed; CPT, Continuous Persistence Test; EBPM, event-based prospective memory; GK, general knowledge; HC, healthy control; IM, immediate memory; PE, perseverative error; PM, prospective memory; RM retrospective memory; SI, similarity; TBPM, time-based prospective memory; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; TMTA, Trail-Making Test Part A; VB, visual breadth; VF, verbal fluency; VP, visual puzzle; WCST, Wisconsin Card Classification Test.