Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Dec 10;5(5):530–541. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.013

Table 2.

Bayesian Pearson correlation values for relationships between commonly-used behavioral summary statistics from the go/no-go task and all DDM parameters. For each correlation, the first number indicates the posterior median, representing the most likely r value, while the second and third numbers (in italics) indicate the upper and lower bounds of the 95% credible interval (CI) for the r value. FA = false alarm, MRT = mean response time, SDRT = standard deviation of response time, v.go = drift rate on “go” trials, v.nogo = drift rate on “no go” trials, v.avg = mean of v.go and v.nogo, z = start point (with higher values), a = boundary separation, Ter = non-decision time.

Bayesian Pearson Correlations
FA rate Hit MRT Hit SDRT v.go v.nogo v.avg z a
FA rate
Hit MRT −.10
.07
.25
Hit SDRT .23 .76
.38 .82
.07 .67
v.go −.67 −.42 −.64
.56 .27 .53
.75 .54 .73
v.nogo −.66 −.33 −.53 .73
.55 .18 .39 .79
.74 .47 .63 .63
v.avg −.71 −.41 −.63 .94 .92
.62 .26 .52 .96 .94
.78 .53 .72 .92 .88
z .53 −.29 −.19 −.14 −.07 −.12
.63 .13 .02 .02 .10 .05
.39 .43 .34 .30 .23 .27
a −.34 .55 .38 .14 −.10 .03 −.08
.18 .65 .51 .29 .06 .19 .09
.47 .42 .23 .03 .26 .14 .24
Ter −.21 .50 −.03 .11 .12 .12 .02 .10
.05 .61 .13 .26 .28 .28 .18 .26
.36 .36 .19 .06 .04 .04 .14 .06