Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 11;36(2):573–595. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09908-2

Table 2.

Baseline equivalence evaluation between the experimental group (n = 56) and the control group (n = 55)

Experimental group Control group T p value
Mean SD Mean SD
Age 17.55 1.60 17.73 1.66 − 0.56 n.s.a
Gambling frequency 2.57 1.82 2.11 1.52 1.45 n.s.
Amount of money spent 2.34 1.25 1.95 1.16 1.72 n.s.
Total hours 0.16 0.27 0.12 0.22 1.03 n.s.
Attitudes 24.02 3.64 23.76 4.47 0.33 n.s.
Knowledge 21.38 2.95 21.89 3.41 − 0.85 n.s.
Misconceptions 17.16 2.31 16.25 3.03 1.77 n.s.
Sensation seeking 3.47 0.79 3.45 0.85 0.12 n.s.
N (M) N (F) N (M) N (F) Chi square p value
Gender 24 32 22 33 0.09 n.s.
N (NPGs) N (ARPGs) N (NPGs) N (ARPGs)b
Problem gambling behaviour 44 12 50 5 3.25 n.s.

aNon-significant (n.s.)

bNon-problem gamblers (NPGs) versus at-risk/problem gamblers (ARPGs). Non-problem gamblers (NPGs) were categorized as having a score of 0 or 1 and at-risk/problem gamblers (ARPGs) as having a score of 2 or higher in the DSM-IV-J-MR instrument